[Ietf-dkim] Re: PROPOSAL: reopen this working group and work on DKIM2

2024-11-09 Thread Jim Fenton
On 8 Nov 2024, at 23:20, Pete Resnick wrote: On 8 Nov 2024, at 16:13, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: If the goal is to favor running code over mere pontification, I think that's a solid proposal... That it certainly true. But I think we do want code that is not just running, but is also usable

[Ietf-dkim] Re: PROPOSAL: reopen this working group and work on DKIM2

2024-11-09 Thread Pete Resnick
On 9 Nov 2024, at 8:38, Jim Fenton wrote: Email, as a service, has to serve both large providers and small. It’s important that the charter consider the needs of small providers as well as the large ones. This is a theoretical concern at this point, and I hope we don’t end up in a situation wh

[Ietf-dkim] Re: PROPOSAL: reopen this working group and work on DKIM2

2024-11-09 Thread Jim Fenton
On 9 Nov 2024, at 17:25, Pete Resnick wrote: > On 9 Nov 2024, at 17:07, Jim Fenton wrote: > >> On 9 Nov 2024, at 13:16, Pete Resnick wrote: >> >>> On 9 Nov 2024, at 8:38, Jim Fenton wrote: >>> suggest that the charter acknowledge that scalability is important and stop there. >>> >>> W

[Ietf-dkim] Re: PROPOSAL: reopen this working group and work on DKIM2

2024-11-09 Thread Richard Clayton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In message <1810e35c-f268-4040-af09-073cccbae...@bluepopcorn.net>, Jim Fenton writes Since I think we have a duty not to heat up the planet any more than absolutely necessary, and since designs with large numbers of crypto operations (to achieve limi

[Ietf-dkim] Re: PROPOSAL: reopen this working group and work on DKIM2

2024-11-09 Thread Jim Fenton
On 9 Nov 2024, at 13:16, Pete Resnick wrote: > On 9 Nov 2024, at 8:38, Jim Fenton wrote: > >> Email, as a service, has to serve both large providers and small. It’s >> important that the charter consider the needs of small providers as well as >> the large ones. This is a theoretical concern at

[Ietf-dkim] Re: PROPOSAL: reopen this working group and work on DKIM2

2024-11-09 Thread Pete Resnick
On 9 Nov 2024, at 17:07, Jim Fenton wrote: On 9 Nov 2024, at 13:16, Pete Resnick wrote: On 9 Nov 2024, at 8:38, Jim Fenton wrote: suggest that the charter acknowledge that scalability is important and stop there. Well, I would also like something that is clear that running code is favored