Re: [Ietf-dkim] DKIM Signature

2023-10-31 Thread Alessandro Vesely
On Mon 30/Oct/2023 20:44:20 +0100 Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: I still think ED25519 is not gracefully supported by all DKIM implementations because you cannot use a stream based approach, but must load the entire data "in memory", it is a one-off algorithm. Irrespective of what the advantage of s

Re: [Ietf-dkim] DKIM Signature

2023-10-31 Thread Laura Atkins
> On 31 Oct 2023, at 00:26, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: > > > |4. I don't understand how that is relevant to the current working group > |topic of a problem statement > > (that is what the thread is about) There is nothing in the current problem statement that is discussing changing the algori

Re: [Ietf-dkim] DKIM Signature

2023-10-31 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso
Alessandro Vesely wrote in : |On Mon 30/Oct/2023 20:44:20 +0100 Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: |> I still think ED25519 is not gracefully supported by all DKIM implementa\ |> tions |> because you cannot use a stream based approach, but must load the \ |> entire data |> "in memory", it is a one-of

Re: [Ietf-dkim] DKIM Signature

2023-10-31 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso
Laura Atkins wrote in <9a3fef5d-ce9c-4b69-8049-43c62dd3d...@wordtothewise.com>: |> On 31 Oct 2023, at 00:26, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: |>|4. I don't understand how that is relevant to the current working group |>|topic of a problem statement |> |> (that is what the thread is about) | |Ther