[Ietf-dkim] DKIM-FBL

2023-09-27 Thread Brotman, Alex
Hey folks, I'm not entirely sure this is the right place for this. Someone else suggested the DMARC list, and I thought perhaps the "smtp" list might make more sense. If I'm shuffled off to one of those lists, I'll let this thread know. I've attached a draft that uses attributes of a passing

Re: [Ietf-dkim] DKIM-FBL

2023-09-27 Thread Alessandro Vesely
On 9/27/23 13:36, Brotman, Alex wrote: I've attached a draft that uses attributes of a passing DKIM signature to create a DNS label that can be used to discover an FBL address. This feedback address can be used by message receivers to provide a copy of FN (and potentially FP) (Spam/Not-Spam) r

Re: [Ietf-dkim] DKIM-FBL

2023-09-27 Thread Brotman, Alex
Some senders use a different selector when sending from different ESPs while they use the same d= in the DKIM signature. Good point on that usage. That should be "report generator(s)". -- Alex Brotman Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy Comcast > -Original Message- > From: I

Re: [Ietf-dkim] DKIM-FBL

2023-09-27 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
I'm betting the chairs would want this not to consume any of the so-far-meager energy this WG is showing. I can imagine that ietf-smtp would be a reasonable place to at least announce that you're working on this. I don't know that that's a good home for ongoing discussion either though. We don't