Re: [Ietf-dkim] Call for adoption results: draft-ietf-dkim-replay-problem Adopted

2023-08-02 Thread Alessandro Vesely
On Tue 01/Aug/2023 16:09:03 + Tim Wicinski wrote: Problem Statements may be published but are more importantly considered working documents with consensus from the working group. We should get more "what didn't work" - people should send text ! I agree what-didnt-work can efficiently com

[Ietf-dkim] replay is a bogus concept

2023-08-02 Thread Michael Thomas
Barry Leiba Tue, 01 August 2023 18:40 UTC As someone who has, as an AD, questioned the publication of such background documents, even in working groups I chartered, I can give a related opinion about this one: I do think the background is important to publish separately for this work, however e

Re: [Ietf-dkim] Tolerating Mailing-List Modifications I-D

2023-08-02 Thread Michael Thomas
Dude. This is so 20 years ago. It only gets you so far. I should know. There is nothing for IETF to do here. The basic tools are already available in DKIM to do this. It's up to individual sites to determine their own tolerance to changes and that's nothing the IETF has any say over. And it mos