Jesse Thompson wrote in
:
|On Thu, Aug 17, 2023, at 12:02 PM, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
|> More, usually (it happened in the past) they then point to their
|> web site, where you then *do*, and isn't the certificate of that
|> website, which itself is likely verified by some CA in some CA
|> po
On Thu, Aug 17, 2023, at 12:02 PM, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
> More, usually (it happened in the past) they then point to their
> web site, where you then *do*, and isn't the certificate of that
> website, which itself is likely verified by some CA in some CA
> pool that you do not have control over,
Alessandro Vesely wrote in
<652789f7-0a0a-f8db-11f9-2558bc9ec...@tana.it>:
|On Thu 17/Aug/2023 04:45:48 +0200 Bron Gondwana wrote:
|> On Tue, Aug 15, 2023, at 21:36, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
|>> On Tue 15/Aug/2023 08:10:23 +0200 Bron Gondwana wrote:
|>>> We've love to not sign spam at all, but
On Thu 17/Aug/2023 04:45:48 +0200 Bron Gondwana wrote:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023, at 21:36, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
On Tue 15/Aug/2023 08:10:23 +0200 Bron Gondwana wrote:
We've love to not sign spam at all, but short of never allowing users to send email, it's
not actually possible. We're not tr
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023, at 21:36, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> On Tue 15/Aug/2023 08:10:23 +0200 Bron Gondwana wrote:
>
> > We've love to not sign spam at all, but short of never allowing users to
> > send email, it's not actually possible. We're not trying to "accomodate
> > sites that send spam",
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 9:29 AM Emanuel Schorsch wrote:
> Still, knowing that he's a bad actor, you could skip signing. Are there
>> so
>> many new spammers every day? Or, rather, there is a bunch of
>> professional
>> spammers who know how to hide?
>>
>
> Just to answer the second question: Ye
>
> Still, knowing that he's a bad actor, you could skip signing. Are there
> so
> many new spammers every day? Or, rather, there is a bunch of professional
> spammers who know how to hide?
>
Just to answer the second question: Yes, absolutely. Spammers are fully
professional and organized group
On Tue 15/Aug/2023 08:10:23 +0200 Bron Gondwana wrote:
On Thu, Aug 3, 2023, at 15:50, Michael Thomas wrote:
Barry Leiba Tue, 01 August 2023 18:40 UTC
I do think the background is important to publish separately for this
work, however easy the problem is to describe.
It's because "replay" is
On Thu, Aug 3, 2023, at 15:50, Michael Thomas wrote:
> Barry Leiba Tue, 01 August 2023 18:40 UTC
>
> As someone who has, as an AD, questioned the publication of such
> background documents, even in working groups I chartered, I can give a
> related opinion about this one:
>
> I do think the back
