Re: [Ietf-dkim] Tolerating Mailing-List Modifications I-D

Dude. This is so 20 years ago. It only gets you so far. I should know. There is nothing for IETF to do here. The basic tools are already available in DKIM to do this. It's up to individual sites to determine their own tolerance to changes and that's nothing the IETF has any say over. And it mos

[Ietf-dkim] Tolerating Mailing-List Modifications I-D Update

I've posted a -01 update to draft-chuang-mailing-list-modifications . - Based on ARC RFC8617 (instead of draft-chuang-replay-resistant-arc) - Specify mailing-list procedures for rewriting the Subject, From and

Re: [Ietf-dkim] Tolerating Mailing-List Modifications I-D

uld change: > | > |Subject: Re: [Ietf-dkim] Tolerating Mailing-List Modifications I-D > | > |to: > | > |Subject: [ietf-dkim] Re: [Ietf-dkim] Tolerating Mailing-List > Modifications \ > |I-D > > Unfortunately it seems it becomes the new norm -- on those MLs > whi

Re: [Ietf-dkim] Tolerating Mailing-List Modifications I-D

ich implies > they > won't verify unless computed with the relaxed algorithm. > > > > N.B. I've not read draft-chuang-replay-resistant-arc yet. > > > Me neither. > > > > [...] > > Old: > > > > Subject: This is a test > > > &

Re: [Ietf-dkim] Tolerating Mailing-List Modifications I-D

On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 8:34 PM Grant Taylor wrote: > On 7/12/23 9:26 AM, Wei Chuang wrote: > > Hi folks, > > Hi Wei, > > > Being able to reverse mailing-list message modifications to repair > > the message and enable digital signature verification, would resolve > > a significant roadblock for f

Re: [Ietf-dkim] Tolerating Mailing-List Modifications I-D

Alessandro Vesely wrote in : |On Thu 13/Jul/2023 05:33:44 +0200 Grant Taylor wrote: ... |> Change: |> |>    s/^Subject:\s+\(.*\)$/Subject:  [ietf-dkim] \1/ | | |This would change: | |Subject: Re: [Ietf-dkim] Tolerating Mailing-List Modifications I-D | |to: | |Subject: [

Re: [Ietf-dkim] Tolerating Mailing-List Modifications I-D

t:\s+\(.*\)$/Subject:  [ietf-dkim] \1/ This would change: Subject: Re: [Ietf-dkim] Tolerating Mailing-List Modifications I-D to: Subject: [ietf-dkim] Re: [Ietf-dkim] Tolerating Mailing-List Modifications I-D I absolutely agree that regular expressions have problems and may open up a can of worm

Re: [Ietf-dkim] Tolerating Mailing-List Modifications I-D

On 7/12/23 9:26 AM, Wei Chuang wrote: Hi folks, Hi Wei, Being able to reverse mailing-list message modifications to repair the message and enable digital signature verification, would resolve a significant roadblock for further DMARC deployment. Potentially it would allow better attributio

[Ietf-dkim] Tolerating Mailing-List Modifications I-D

Hi folks, Being able to reverse mailing-list message modifications to repair the message and enable digital signature verification, would resolve a significant roadblock for further DMARC deployment. Potentially it would allow better attribution of which party contributed which content in the mess