On 2/3/2025 8:58 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
On Sat, Feb 1, 2025 at 10:00 AM Dave Crocker wrote:
As such, an honest and pragmatic charter needs to cite that draft
and needs to explicitly encourage consideration of alternatives.
I think I'm fine with adding something like this, thou
On Sat, Feb 1, 2025 at 10:00 AM Dave Crocker wrote:
> As such, an honest and pragmatic charter needs to cite that draft and
> needs to explicitly encourage consideration of alternatives.
>
I think I'm fine with adding something like this, though I would hope
everyone realizes that it's expected
On 1/28/2025 7:29 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
I've uploaded the discussed changes to the charter,
Core advocates of this effort are thoroughly committed to the details of
their draft document.
And they have been consistently hostile to proposals for alternative
details, either ignoring t
Thanks for all your work on this Murray, that looks great. It's good to
explicitly mention backscatter, and not to constrain the working group
unnecessarily to use specific documents. I'm in favour of going ahead with
this charter.
Bron
On Wed, Jan 29, 2025, at 02:29, Murray S. Kucherawy wro
looks good to me
On Wed, 29 Jan 2025, at 2:29 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> I've uploaded the discussed changes to the charter, which can be seen
> (including viewing a delta to the last version) in the datatracker here:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-dkim/
>
> I have also
On 1/28/2025 1:04 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
It's optional. I can add them but I'll also add wording that avoids
compelling the formed WG to adopt those items if it decides not to
start there.
The previous work is dominating the thinking of the principals for this
effort. It really will
Perfect! Thanks (again)
From: Murray S. Kucherawy
Date: Tuesday, January 28, 2025 at 2:04 PM
To: Trent Adams
Cc: Ietf-dkim@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ietf-dkim] Charter v5 available
On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 12: 59 PM Trent Adams wrote:
Looks great to me. . . just one question. . . should the cha
On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 12:59 PM Trent Adams wrote:
> Looks great to me... just one question... should the charter make any
> reference to the preliminary documents that’ve been proposed as potential
> starting points for consideration?
>
>
>
> I believe they can easily be brought into the conver
Murray -
Looks great to me... just one question... should the charter make any reference
to the preliminary documents that’ve been proposed as potential starting points
for consideration?
I believe they can easily be brought into the conversation later, but was just
wanting to clarify if it’d
It appears that Murray S. Kucherawy said:
>There is still time to make changes during any of that period.
Minor nit: in the Background section, the two sentences in the third
bullet should be separate items. Backscatter is one problem,
shortcut bounces are another, even though I expect we will
That all looks good to me.
laura
> On 28 Jan 2025, at 15:29, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>
> I've uploaded the discussed changes to the charter, which can be seen
> (including viewing a delta to the last version) in the datatracker here:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-dkim
Without delving into technical discussion, this gives us a good framework to
start with.
--
Alex Brotman
Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy
Comcast
From: Murray S. Kucherawy
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2025 10:30 AM
To: ietf-dkim@ietf.org
Subject: [Ietf-dkim] Charter v5 available
I've
> On 28 Jan 2025, at 15:29, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>
> I've uploaded the discussed changes to the charter, which can be seen
> (including viewing a delta to the last version) in the datatracker here:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-dkim/
>
> I have also tweaked the mile
On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 9:32 AM Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>
> I've uploaded the discussed changes to the charter, which can be seen
> (including viewing a delta to the last version) in the datatracker here:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-dkim/
I think this is great.
And this
14 matches
Mail list logo
