Sorry for the delay. Top level, I agree that this draft tightens up the
details in a beneficial way, and the working group ought to work off the
crocker version. I'm happy to also merge this version in my
problem-statement draft also.
My interpretation of the changes, is that the crocker draft r
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
<20230310002254.3yxyh%stef...@sdaoden.eu>:
|Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
| <20230309221555.or-j9%stef...@sdaoden.eu>:
...
||one could add one entry for each, with the necessity to cover all
||of these in the signature. Then receivers could check all in turn
...
|Of c
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
<20230309221555.or-j9%stef...@sdaoden.eu>:
...
|one could add one entry for each, with the necessity to cover all
|of these in the signature. Then receivers could check all in turn
|and pick one matching. ([Of course] The values of all those
Of course this is total
Dave Crocker wrote in
<6a11d9c6-21aa-872d-a0ce-53420769f...@dcrocker.net>:
|Name: draft-crocker-dkim-replay
"mighty" surely means "might".
In 2.2 "Outbound filtering" -> "Outbound filtering:".
Items in 4. have no final punctuation but the last.
Vice versa in first list of 5.
No final punctuation
On 3/9/2023 7:04 AM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
it would be useful to the working group if the authors
could perhaps summarize the differences between them.
As I noted, mine is a revision of Wei's. (And I have been among the
contributors to his, for some months.) If adopted, the author list needs
t
Dave
Thanks for publishing this. So we (as the working group) have two problem
statement drafts to read and consider.
Wonderful!
I'm going to do my reading of both (as I hope all will), but it would be
useful to the working group if the authors
could perhaps summarize the differences between th
FYI:
[NOTE:] This draft is based on the Problem Statement developed by
Wei Chuan and others (including me) over some months. This
version is offered as a refinement of that draft, with a
tighter focus. Rather than being a 'separate' document, it
should be tr
