amp; Messaging Policy
Comcast
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Crocker
> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2023 1:05 PM
> To: Brotman, Alex
> Cc: ietf-dkim@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Ietf-dkim] DKIM-FBL
>
> On 9/27/2023 7:41 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> > We don
On 9/27/2023 7:41 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
We don't really have a venue that talks about feedback loops that I
can find,
I strongly suggest pursuing this first in a group devoted to anti-abuse
email, with a range of software developers and platform providers.
This will ensure both subj
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023, at 9:06 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> On 9/27/23 13:36, Brotman, Alex wrote:
> > I've attached a draft that uses attributes of a passing DKIM
> > signature to create a DNS label that can be used to discover an FBL
> > address. This feedback address can be used by message r
On 9/27/23 16:47, Brotman, Alex wrote:
Some senders use a different selector when sending from different ESPs while
they use the same d= in the DKIM signature.
Don't same d= mean they don't want to differentiate? Using a different
selector is an a artifact of keys distribution; it doesn't re
I'm betting the chairs would want this not to consume any of the
so-far-meager energy this WG is showing. I can imagine that ietf-smtp
would be a reasonable place to at least announce that you're working on
this. I don't know that that's a good home for ongoing discussion either
though.
We don't
ssage-
> From: Ietf-dkim On Behalf Of Alessandro Vesely
> Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2023 10:07 AM
> To: ietf-dkim@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Ietf-dkim] DKIM-FBL
>
> On 9/27/23 13:36, Brotman, Alex wrote:
> > I've attached a draft that uses attributes of a passing
On 9/27/23 13:36, Brotman, Alex wrote:
I've attached a draft that uses attributes of a passing DKIM
signature to create a DNS label that can be used to discover an FBL
address. This feedback address can be used by message receivers to
provide a copy of FN (and potentially FP) (Spam/Not-Spam) r
Hey folks,
I'm not entirely sure this is the right place for this. Someone else suggested
the DMARC list, and I thought perhaps the "smtp" list might make more sense.
If I'm shuffled off to one of those lists, I'll let this thread know.
I've attached a draft that uses attributes of a passing
