On Wed, 15 Dec 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all.
> I have read that an inter domain router (connected to the big Internet) has a
> routing table with 42000 entries (this value refers to the end of 1996). I would
> like to know if it is possible to estimate the number of entries of an intra
CC'd to NANOG, maybe we can move this there.
On Fri, 11 Feb 2000, Paul Ferguson wrote:
> It would allow the attacks to be traced back to the zombies (in
> the case of these DDoS attacks), and the perpetrators to be traced
> back and identified.
To make that easier, what is needed is something
usion Detection at the Ohio
> State University
> http://www.usenix.org/publications/login/1999-9/osu.html
>
>
> If anyone else has useful links (it doesn't matter who
> is the vendor, whatever), please let me know.
>
> - paul
>
> At 09:01 PM 02/11/2000 -0500, Vij
On Tue, 11 Apr 2000, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> And the latest kludge which has been called to my attention is ISP's
> that tamper with the MSS values in TCP SYN packets in flight. This is
> done to work around smaller MTU's caused by PPP over Ethernet (and other
> tunnelling mechanisms) interac
On 13 Apr 2000, Marc Horowitz wrote:
> Vijay Gill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> think this would be more of an end system issue rather than a "core" or a
> >> "backbone" issue, where the end system is the box prior to the ISP handoff
>
On Fri, 11 Aug 2000, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
> > The problem is that we (as a profession) don't know
> > how to do that. We have to make routing scale, and
> > that demands aggregation, which in turn demands
> > structured addresses.
>
> The telephone company figured out how to avoid problems
On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Robert Elz wrote:
> There's nothing different this time, the established IPv4 network providers
> see something that is challenging their established way or operating, and
> the current services they offer. Largely they're claiming that this new
> stuff isn't needed, they
