That was the British use of the term "unlikely".
Stewart
Sent from my iPad
On 28 Mar 2013, at 14:05, "Dave Crocker" wrote:
>
>
> On 3/28/2013 6:13 AM, Stewart Bryant wrote:
>> In this particular case the candidate pool would have been tiny,
>> because the criteria would surely have included
Sent from my iPad
On 6 Apr 2013, at 14:04, "Abdussalam Baryun" wrote:
>
> If the date is
> special then thoes RFCs SHOULD be *historical*.
>
Surely the correct requirement is :
If the date is special then those RFCs MUST be *hysterical*.
- Stewart
