lection Process
> iii) Configure the Exporting Process ...
In effect, each of our MUSTs is such a check. At least, that was the
intention.
> 11) It is particularly odd to see a set of Stress/Load tests that
> simultaneously claim to be measuring conformance
Lars,
On 2007-9-6, at 14:51, ext Paul Aitken wrote:
As far as I can see, draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-guidelines-02 contains no
guidance other than:
"Applications that perform bulk transmission of data" (3.1.1)
and
"When applications that exchange only a small number of mes
fully you can offer
us some clarification?
But for now, since we estimate that NetFlow v9 export consumes a mere
2-5% of the bandwidth of a monitored channel, I consider that it does
fall into the "Low Data-Volume" category.
Cheers.
--
Paul Aitken
Cisco Systems Ltd, Edinburgh,
Why does the "mailing list memberships reminder" send passwords in the
clear?
For everything else I'm subscribed to, if I forget my details, one click
sends a one-time password-reset link.
Passwords are never mailed out, and never shown.
Thanks,
P.
John,
Why does the "mailing list memberships reminder" send passwords in the clear?
Because that's what Mailman does. Send code.
And that's acceptable to the IETF? You're kidding me, right?
P.
o passwords are never sent
in the clear.
I find it hard to understand that this is acceptable to the IETF.
Thanks,
P.
On 1 Nov 2012, at 20:20, Paul Aitken wrote:
Why does the "mailing list memberships reminder" send passwords in the clear?
Because mailman is brain-dead stupid. Se
John,
I can't speak for the IETF, but I do note that the same password
notices have been going out on the first of every month for years.
You just noticed iit now?
No, I've been getting the passwords for years. However I just finished a
crypto class and really wondered what the history is h
Can you help me understand why the One Day Pass rate ($350) is so high
compared with the full week rate ($650 / $800)?
Registering for two days could cost more than a week!
Surely the day rate should be a little more than (week/5), eg about $175
- $200, to encourage those who only want/need to
this may change in future if higher
load). If the IETF considers your request, I think it will increase
participation maybe about 5% globaly and 20% locally, so mostly
encourages regional participations. I will also add that if the IETF
can consider newcomers to get discount for one day, because new
I've remotely participated in several IETFs.
I find that the biggest problem with remote attendance is the lack of
visual cues. I've come to realise just how important these are in a meeting.
-are people paying attention, are they interested / confused /
distracted / bored?
Also there's no wa
Ted Lemon wrote:
Ironically, this IETF everyone who stayed at the Intercontinental was
walking around with an RFID key in their pocket the whole meeting.
Could there be a conflict if IETF badges also have RFID tags attached,
eg we get "Room 1283" at the mic?
P.
Joe Abley wrote:
Or perhaps future IETFers.app releases could talk using bluetooth to a
transponder duct-taped to the mic stand and realise the same outcomes
(and if you don't like that, you can always touch "no" in the
appropriate place on your phone).
Instead of requiring additional hardwar
12 matches
Mail list logo
