On Sep 22, 2011, at 2:10 PM, George, Wes wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jari
> Arkko
> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 2:35 PM
> To: ietf@ietf.org; draft-weil-shared-transition-space-requ...@tools.ietf.org
> Subjec
On Sep 23, 2011, at 7:06 AM, George, Wes wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Owen DeLong [mailto:o...@delong.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 6:32 PM
> To: George, Wes
> Cc: Jari Arkko; ietf@ietf.org;
> draft-weil-shared-transition-space-requ...@tools.ietf.o
will use some random mixture of all
of the above
in an uncoordinated and undefined way, making it impossible for vendors to
provide any
mitigation to such breakage.
Respectfully Submitted,
Owen DeLong
Co-author draft-bdgks
IPv6 Evangelist
Director Professional Services
Hurricane Electric
Member, A
I support draft-weil as revised. There is a vital need for this to move forward
and the IETF should stop standing in the way and let ARIN allocate the space
already.
Owen
On Feb 13, 2012, at 10:09 AM, Chris Grundemann wrote:
> Fellow BDGKS Authors,
>
> FYI: draft-weil is in another Last Call
>> +1
>>
>>
>>> I believe the amendments in this revision clarify the usage and intended
>>> purpose of the shared transition space.
>>>
>> +1
>>
>>
> On 2/14/12 10:19 AM, jeff.finkelst...@cox.com wrote:
>>
&g
I also agree with James and Lorenzo.
Owen
On Aug 20, 2013, at 4:58 PM, james woodyatt wrote:
> On Aug 20, 2013, at 02:39 , Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
>>
>> [...] It seems to me that the sheer length of the list, and the fact that is
>> not prioritized, create a real risk that implementors will s
I have to agree with Lorenzo here again.
This document seems to me to be:
1. Out of scope for the IETF.
2. So watered down in its language as to use many words to say
nearly nothing.
3. Claims to be informational, but with so many caveats about the
nature
On Sep 9, 2013, at 13:36 , Vízdal Aleš wrote:
> Please see inline.
>
> Ales
>
> From: v6ops-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:v6ops-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Owen DeLong
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2013 10:07 PM
> To: mohamed.boucad...@orange.com
> Cc: v6...
On Sep 11, 2013, at 02:40 , Abdussalam Baryun
wrote:
> On 9/9/13, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> I have to agree with Lorenzo here again.
>>
>> This document seems to me to be:
>>
>> 1. Out of scope for the IETF.
>
> Please define what is the IETF
