Franck Martin wrote:
On serious note: go in the Alps. The ski stations are nearly empty (no
snow), they have huge capacity (some were Winter Olympic places), the
weather is quite good and the scenery is breath taking.
Might I suggest that you find a suitable venue and a sponsor that can
provide
Dassa wrote:
|> -What kind of city with a population of 75,000 has hotel
|> accommodations for 2000 people unless it's a tourist Mecca
|> and likely expensive and overbooked?
A lot of regional centres are geared to large numbers of tourists/visitors.
As for expensive and overbooked, I find most lar
Dassa wrote:
Actually I find it hard to understand Adelaide having issues with
accommadation unless there was another major event at the same time. How
does it cope with motor sport events, they used to hold some there didn't
they?
Hotels don't like blocking all of their rooms to one event so you
At 7:56 AM -0500 16/3/03, Margaret Wasserman wrote:
What about South America and India. I've heard that both are
substantially less expensive than the US/Europe/Japan for
vacation accomodations. Does the same hold for convention costs?
Out of curiosity I would like to know how the Adelaide meetin
Kevin C. Almeroth wrote:
It might be a good idea to stop comparing Minneapolis to Vienna. Vienna
had a host and Minneapolis did not.
I'm not sure there should be any difference. I was the host in Adelaide
but I didn't do the radios, I "out sourced" them to a local company that
specialises in th
Franck Martin wrote:
Just some perspectives on the IPv6 addressing scheme, that I have
highlighted to APNIC.
A country like Tuvalu with about 10,000 people, which is an island with
many possibility of connectivity to the Internet would be attributed
what range if they request IPv6?
Don't tell me t
I'm definitely interested. So do we have someone with a company
connection who can get the IETF a good bulk discount on 801.11 DS cards?
Especially the 11 megabit variant... (Is Adelaide going to have 11 mbps
support?)
The current plan is to have 802.11 DS 11Mbps support. I
We (at least cisco, anyways) already have a knob for this:
[no] ip verify unicast reverse-path
We call it Unicast RPF.
And its well documented... NOT
and available on all routers/interfaces... NOT
If it was documented and available on things like PRIs then it would
be a lot ea
This is a small percentage, I would thing, since the percentage of
ISP's offering transit pales in comparison to all other "access"
ISP's that do not. And in cases where ISP's _do_ offer transit, or
have transit agreements, will they really do this on their transit
interfa
Lucent will be making available 802.11 DS wireless technology for the
forthcoming meeting in Adelaide. They have offered a similar deal to
Nortel at the last meeting where IETFers can loan a card for the
duration of the meeting and/or buy a card. They would like to get some
idea of how many people
Just another question :-) For people who will want static IPs rather than dynamic (I
assume for firewall configuration), will you want to use wireless? I'm told to keep
MBONE/wired and wireless LANs apart and so I'm trying to determine if I need more than
one static address pool.
Note this is
% If you need to connect to telephone network, Australia has its own
% telephone connector too of course (although I suspect that major hotels
% may have the familar "data port" on the side of the phone).
is it the goofy british plug they use in HongKong?
flipped pa
The problem is not NAT's. The problem is why people have to use
NAT's...they can't get the numbers they need or want, in large measure, due
to the greed of ISP's.
That is a huge generalisation. The ISP I work for offers customers as
many IP numbers as they can justify and at no add
We are investigating the deployment of a wireless LAN infrastructure
(IEEE 802.11) for our building and were hoping to tap into past
experiences from wireless LAN deployments at the IETF meetings. Are
there any documents online that present "guidelines" for deployment
of w
On 21/03/13 1:33 PM, John C Klensin wrote:
--On Wednesday, March 20, 2013 23:36 +0100 Jari Arkko
wrote:
I think it is mostly market forces and historical reasons, and
the development of the IETF to focus on more particular core
aspects of the Internet (like routing) as opposed to what the
sm
15 matches
Mail list logo
