Re: Internet SYN Flooding, spoofing attacks

2000-02-15 Thread Leonid Yegoshin
itm to fight negative caching effect is simple. With millions names in .com there is a long way to keep asking. - Leonid Yegoshin, LY22

Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated?

2000-04-24 Thread Leonid Yegoshin
dresses >be a multiple of the bus width in size, since that simplifies fetching the >next field.) > Routers may use the different addresses for routing. Outbound router may assign "route address" to keep intermediate route tables small. It is not the same as NAT because original and real destination address never replaced. - Leonid Yegoshin.

Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt

2000-04-24 Thread Leonid Yegoshin
of system in real). >otherwise you're in about the same shape as with a NATted network. - Leonid Yegoshin.

Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt

2000-04-25 Thread Leonid Yegoshin
;rather than explicitly. I think such a separation might be a good idea, >because our current means of propagating reachability information >and computing routes does have limitations. but I don't see any need >to change the packet format seen by hosts (from IPv6), or any need to >change end hosts at all, in order to do this. Keith, sorry, didn't read this p.s. before I wrote answer on main mail body. You absolutely understand me, thank you. - Leonid Yegoshin, LY22

Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt

2000-04-25 Thread Leonid Yegoshin
between IP provider and customer pays a big toll: one my friend can't get a right NS address records long time because it "illegally" cached at some providers point and nobody knows where. -

Re: NAT->IPv6

2000-04-25 Thread Leonid Yegoshin
rewall for me - I don't need to keep eye on desktops!" - Leonid Yegoshin, LY22

Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt

2000-04-25 Thread Leonid Yegoshin
resolution it can be deployed on maintainless basis because all needed information already concentrated in routers. There is not any human-like names here and allocation of route addresses may be done automatic (on tree base strategy from some root point in network). - Leonid Yegoshin, LY22

Re: NAT->IPv6

2000-04-25 Thread Leonid Yegoshin
ut it's fast propogation but I remember how terrific IS staff wanted to put firewalls/NATs between each floor ! They considered it as the only warranty and _asked_ money for that. - Leonid Yegoshin, LY22

Re: NAT->IPv6

2000-04-26 Thread Leonid Yegoshin
IS dept thinks. I prefer a mixed solution like uniq host system ID + some controllable route address. - Leonid Yegoshin, LY22

Re: NAT->IPv6

2000-04-26 Thread Leonid Yegoshin
et and difficult to control in classic firewall. Fortunately VoIP may have H.323 or SIP negotiation first but do you sure about another protocols ? - Leonid Yegoshin, LY22

Re: mail sandbox wall authority, inward and outbound

2000-05-11 Thread Leonid Yegoshin
I's Send notify >the user and queue the proposed message as a draft instead of sending.) > 6. A program wants to send a file to somewhere. Or any permanently stored information (like cookie but not limited). - Leonid Yegoshin.

Re: mail sandbox wall authority, inward and outbound

2000-05-12 Thread Leonid Yegoshin
rity is not huge unconvenience for user then virus replication performance decrease dramatic and we lower the number of people who wants to write them. - Leonid Yegoshin. >so the solution is to ditch indecent systems. > >In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Leonid Yeg

Re: mail sandbox wall authority, inward and outbound

2000-05-12 Thread Leonid Yegoshin
to port 25" ? And how many Windows users know "attached program wants to open file C:\windows\cpl32.xxx: is it legitimate ?" Predicted reaction after month or two is - press "OK". - Leonid Yegoshin.