t is another long discussion.
Kevin Farley
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos - 35mm Quality Prints, Now Get 15 Free!
http://photos.yahoo.com/
> > How does the idea of NAT destroy the global Internet address space?
>
> because in a NATted network the same addresses are used in different
> parts of the network. addresses are meaningless.
So what? Why is this the big problem?
__
Do You
--- Sean Doran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Keith Moore writes:
>
> | but I'm fairly convinced that we are *far* better off with a global
> | name space for network attachment points, which are exposed and
> | visible to hosts and applications, than we are with only locally
> | scoped addresses
ies?
So when it comes to buying NAT devices, "buyer beware" should be the
mantra of the day.
And now the question(s) of the day:
What is the solution that can be deployed today or in the next 6 months
that will replace the function of NATs in the IPv4 Internet? What about
in the next y
Keith,
Thank you for your insightful response to my posting. Is it fair to say
then, that in the year 2001, there appears to be no widely deployable
alternative to NAT?
Kevin
--- Keith Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kevin,
>
> I don't disagree with most of your assertions, except perhaps o
s the beef?
Kevin Farley
__
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
>
> > > The host *is* the edge of the network.
> >
> > I'm sorry to have not mentioned that I consider the host nodes, or
> the end nodes, are not edges but instead something attaching on
> network edges. I consider the very last hub, or the access router
> which the end nodes connected to as th
>
> IMHO, a successful WG is one whereby it has been successful been
> adopted
> and used by the industry.
>
> -James Seng
>
>
Like NAT?
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year! http://personal.
--- John Stracke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> > This "list of lists", alas, would become a spammer/head-hunter
> target if
> > made too easily accessible, but we already have that problem.
>
> In addition, it would mean that anybody subscribed to one IETF list
>
--- John Stracke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kevin Farley wrote:
>
> > --- John Stracke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Today, if you want to
> > > spam all of
> > > them, you have to subscribe to all of them, which is impractical.
>
>
I think I might set a filter to look for this thread in the subject
line of my email and dump it. It only takes a minute to set it up.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/
For what its worth, and maybe its just that I haven't mucked around
with the standard templates for MS Word, but I print ID's and RFC's
through MS Word by adjusting page setup.
If you open the plain text ID text document and set the page setup to
0.9" top margin and 0.8" bottom margin, it should
> > That's what killfiles and filters are for.
>
> Yes. And the filter is now in place.
>
I just set a new filter to get rid of this thread. I can't take it
anymore.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://persona
13 matches
Mail list logo
