Am Apr 6, 2013 um 8:52 schrieb Hector Santos :
> Hi Abdusalam,
>
> You should consider all APRIL 1 published I-D as "SPAM" and the electronic
> mail follow ups generated in the IETF list as more wasted bandwidth, time and
> spam. We have too much time in our hands, boredom for many, and even
Am Aug 3, 2013 um 9:05 schrieb Abdussalam Baryun :
> On 8/3/13, Patrik Fältström wrote:
>> On 3 aug 2013, at 08:46, Abdussalam Baryun
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I prefer if you post at end of Friday (as in the end of working days of 5
>>> in each week).
>
>>> However, in my comment below I
>>> will fol
Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 03:39:27AM -0700, Greg Shepherd:
> On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 5:53 AM, Mary Barnes wrote:
>
> > I did have some annoyances with the housekeeping, in particular the
> > rewashing of glasses/mugs in the bathroom sink and someone else's soap bar
> > ending up in my bathroom.
> >
>
Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 09:40:31AM -0500, Stephen Sprunk:
> Thus spake "Noel Chiappa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > From: "Stephen Sprunk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > > _understand_ why PI is necessary, however much they dislike and/or
> >fear
> > > it.
> >
> >Most (all?) of us understand and accep
i nominate bush, should he choose to accept, moderator of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 06:01:37AM -, D. J. Bernstein:
> It has been a week since my latest attempt to get Bush to stop screwing
> around with my messages. As per his new instructions, I sent a message
> to [EMAIL PROTECT
please note that the ptomaine list, formerly [EMAIL PROTECTED], has
been consumed by GROW.
Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 13:29:11 -0700
The PTOMAINE mailing list is in the process of being
retired. GROW is taking its place. If you are not already
on the GROW list and want to subscri
so long as those folks arent interrupting the meeting (cell phones
ringing, talking about unrelated topics, ...), perhaps you all
should worry about what _you_ are doing. is it too far fetched to
believe that some folks can answer mail and listen at the same time.
there are some who attend the me
we (ietf 55 noc folks) have _indirectly_ heard complaints about
connectivity. the rumors we have heard are as follows:
o nokia APs crash under load "every 20 minutes" and nokia refused to use
cisco APs.
the APs are not nokia APs (the nokia sticker indicates to whom they
belong). the APs a
Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 02:05:28PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > folks have to tell the noc
> > about observed
> > problems, rather than just complaining to your couch
> > neighbor.
>
> ... and the noc has to help instead of telling people to go away. I
> requested a static IP, was asked why I ne
Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:13:12AM -0400, Russ Housley:
> I thought that the whole community would like to be aware of this status.
>
> Russ
My understanding is that the registries have not been reassigning ASNs
that are returns but were not allocated from IANA as part of a block.
AS1 for example, wo
Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:46:01AM -0400, Steve Crocker:
> I strongly advise against quick reallocation of returned AS numbers.
> Returned AS numbers should stay out of service for a substantial period
> of time.
why? because someone somewhere might have policy with one of these ASNs
hard-coded?
Tue, May 05, 2009 at 08:22:27PM +0200, Florian Weimer:
> * Steve Crocker:
>
> > I strongly advise against quick reallocation of returned AS numbers.
> > Returned AS numbers should stay out of service for a substantial
> > period of time.
>
> Why?
>
> It seems to be consensus among operators that
Wed, May 06, 2009 at 08:49:42AM +0200, Mans Nilsson:
> > Is the 15ms moritorium excessive?
>
> No. Perhaps even short. A month should be appropriate. Those who update
> their filters based on RIR data with some support system assistance do
> so daily/weekly. Those who have manually updated
13 matches
Mail list logo
