Subscriber List Damage

2008-06-28 Thread Glen
ietf.org/secretariat/ Thank you, Glen Barney IT Director AMS (IETF Secretariat) ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Re: Subscriber List Damage

2008-06-30 Thread Glen
for those two lists that was just sitting around, not being used. Glen ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Re: Subscriber List Damage

2008-06-30 Thread Glen
#x27;m going to take any further threads off-list to keep the lists focused on their primary purposes. Glen Eric Rescorla wrote: At Mon, 30 Jun 2008 15:48:10 -0700, Michael Thomas wrote: 1) Have you brought this up with the mailman folks? I've interacted with them and they seem like a

Test, please ignore

2008-09-05 Thread Glen
We apologize for this test, but are making sure that list mail is continuing to work properly. Thank you for your patience. Glen ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Re: SORBS blacklist

2011-07-01 Thread Glen
e seen at: http://www.ietf.org/secretariat.html Thanks! :-) Glen Glen Barney IT Director AMS (IETF Secretariat) ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email

2011-07-25 Thread Glen
we express our thanks to him for his service to the IETF. As always, any questions or issues, please feel free to contact me, or submit to ietf-action. Thank you, Glen Glen Barney IT Director AMS (IETF Secretariat) ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org

Planned IETF outage Monday evening

2011-09-05 Thread Glen
interruption will take approximately 20 minutes. There is no need to panic, I will be handling the failback personally, and will have service restored as soon as possible. Thank you for your patience. Glen Glen Barney IT Director AMS (IETF Secretariat) ___ Ietf

Planned IETF outage Monday evening

2011-09-05 Thread Glen
edure has been completed. Thank you for your patience. Glen Glen Barney IT Director AMS (IETF Secretariat) ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Re: Problems accessing www.ietf.org over IPv6

2009-03-31 Thread Glen
AID...) Lets hope that > improves soon... We have filed a ticket with AT&T on this end as well. Glen Barney IT Director AMS (IETF Secretariat) ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Re: Problems accessing www.ietf.org over IPv6

2009-03-31 Thread Glen
Glen wrote: > We have filed a ticket with AT&T on this end as well. And just to amplify on this point: We are aware of the issues between Global Crossing, OCCAID, and AT&T, and have reported them. When we get additional data, we send it to them immediately. I have communication from

Test Message

2009-06-07 Thread Glen
Test message, please ignore. We've been asked to send a test message to this list, to ensure there are no problems with the IETF list. Thank you. Glen Barney AMS ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Datatracker Testing, Duplicate Last Call Announcements

2009-07-09 Thread Glen
rly so bad that I have no choice but to use high explosives. I apologize for the upcoming distruption, and beg your indulgence as I apply a bit more persuasion to the system. Thank you, Glen Barney IT Director AMS (IETF Secretariat) ___ Ietf mailing

Testing Complete, Normal Operation Resumed

2009-07-09 Thread Glen
target broken messages. As a result, there may be more instances of broken messages until we get the entire database hand-searched and corrected which will, needless to say, take time. Thank you for your patience. Glen Barney IT Director AMS (IETF Secretariat

Certificate Warnings for IETF Websites

2009-08-30 Thread Glen
d, we expect that we'll get a quick resolution to this issue from Verisign. Glen Barney IT Director AMS (IETF Secretariat) ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Certificate Warnings for IETF Websites appear to be resolved

2009-08-30 Thread Glen
continues to have issues beyond this announcement, please let me know so we can delve further; however, at this point, I believe we have this resolved. Thanks to Milan and Michael for their help! Glen Barney IT Director, AMS (IETF Secretariat) ___ Ietf

Re: Fwd: Current ietf e-mail delays

2009-09-01 Thread Glen
and contact methods and information are available on the IETF website. Warm regards, Glen Barney IT Director AMS (IETF Secretariat) ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Unexpected confirmation messages from the IETF

2009-12-25 Thread Glen
enjoy your holidays. Glen Barney IT Director AMS (IETF Secretariat) ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Spam Filter Y2.1K Bug

2010-01-02 Thread Glen
ave interaction with, worldwide, until this gets fixed. Happy new year. Glen Glen Barney IT Director AMS ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Re: Spam Filter Y2.1K Bug

2010-01-04 Thread Glen
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 12:45:07PM -0800, Glen wrote: > All - > For those of you who may have experienced alcohol-related blackouts in > the past 48 hours, please be advised that the year is now 2010. Good morning/day: I have received a surprising number of messages over the past

RFC Editor Transition Announcement

2010-01-08 Thread Glen
Greetings All and Happy New Year, With the new year comes the RFC Editor production and publisher function transition from USC/ISI to AMS as the new RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher. ISI and AMS have been working diligently behind the scenes to make this transition process as seamless as p

RFC Server Outage Report

2012-04-06 Thread Glen
ppropriate course of action. Reality (and various international laws) prevents us from totally eliminating those type of threats. This attack was caught, handled quickly, and AMS staff continues to watch for any future threats that doubtless will come our way at some point. Thank you for your attent

Re: IETF posting delays

2012-05-08 Thread Glen
further questions or problems, please direct a new message to: ietf-act...@ietf.org and a member of the secretariat staff will assist you. Glen Glen Barney IT Director AMS (IETF Secretariat)

Mailman service interruption yesterday

2013-08-29 Thread Glen
l only reach us after many delays, if at all. Please note and keep a copy of the correct addresses to use to reach us, shown above, if you need to. Thank you for your patience during this outage. Glen Barney IT Director AMS (IETF Secretariat)

RE: 60th IETF - Registration

2004-05-18 Thread Glen Zorn
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ writes: > I think is unacceptably TODAY, specially for IETF, that we should use > a phone instead of on-line or email confirmation. > > We should not accept hotels that don't make usage of technology to > arrange our meetings. Are you expecting,

RE: T-shirts, and some suggestions for future ietf meetings

2004-08-10 Thread Glen Zorn
,,, > Frankly, as long as we can have BAR BOFs in the Hotel, the location > of the food doesn't matter. > > Vienna suffered from having meeting space and hotel seperated, and > unclear default "BAR". Orlando had the same problem. Hmm. As I recall, the meeting space was in the hotel in Or

RE: List of standards

2004-08-18 Thread Glen Zorn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > --On 17 August 2004 09:20 -0700 Bob Braden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> *> From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> *> >> *> Why is the list of internet standards so hard to find? *> >> *> It seems to me this list deserves

RE: [HOKEY] EMSK Issue

2008-03-18 Thread Glen Zorn
Charles Clancy <> scribbled on : > HOKEY, > > From Bernard's "walled garden" LC comments, I've created the > following issue below in the issue tracker. Some of us don't subscribe to the IETF list (due to the extremely poor S/N ratio). Someone did forward me Bernard's original message & to me i

RE: [HOKEY] EMSK Issue

2008-03-20 Thread Glen Zorn
Brian E Carpenter <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribbled on Tuesday, March 18, 2008 11:02 PM: > Glen, > > > On 2008-03-19 04:31, Glen Zorn wrote: > ... >> Some of us don't subscribe to the IETF list (due to the extremely >> poor S/N ratio). Someone did

Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-geopriv-radius-lo (Carrying Location Objects in RADIUS and Diameter) to Proposed Standard

2008-04-27 Thread Glen Zorn
In the description of the Operator-Name Attribute (section 3.1), the discussion of the encoding of a name in the "REALM" namespace is incomplete, at best. First, there is no discussion of the steps (if any) to be taken if the toASCII conversion fails in the case of a realm name containing non-ASC

RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-geopriv-radius-lo (Carrying Location Objects in RADIUS and Diameter) to Pr

2008-04-29 Thread Glen Zorn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <> scribbled on Tuesday, April 29, 2008 12:02 AM: >> Last but not least, this draft fairly universally violates several >> of the guidelines given in >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-radext-design-02.txt, >> in particular those regarding the use of tags to associ

Secdir review of draft-ietf-iptel-tel-reg-05

2008-05-04 Thread Glen Zorn
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like an

RE: [Geopriv] Last Call: draft-ietf-geopriv-radius-lo (CarryingLocation Objects in RADIUS and Diameter) to Pr

2008-05-05 Thread Glen Zorn
David B. Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribbled on Tuesday, April 29, 2008 10:45 AM: ... >> The RADIUS server "requires location information for computing the >> authorization decision". How can it make a decision based upon data >> that it cannot understand? > > This is where the delineation get

RE: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration

2008-05-28 Thread Glen Zorn
Ray Pelletier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The IETF Trust is considering applying to the U.S. Library of Congress > to obtain an International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) for the RFC > Series and would like community input to inform its decision. The > Trust > may take up this matter on June 1

Comment on draft-ietf-radext-design-05.txt

2008-11-11 Thread Glen Zorn
This document is 36 pages long, yet devotes only a single paragraph to the use of extended RADIUS attributes. Since the extended attribute set is likely the one to be most used in the future, this seems a rather gross oversight. I would suggest that the authors try to design a few extended attrib

RE: joining the IETF is luxury Re: 70th IETF - Registration

2007-09-10 Thread Glen Zorn
... [gwz] (I wonder how much the costs would go down if the meeting ended at 4PM Thursday instead of noon on Friday, and there was only one plenary night on Wednesday.) [gwz] [gwz] Probably not at all. I only have experience with sponsoring one IETF, but in that case (& I believe generally) the

secdir review of draft-ietf-sip-uri-list-conferencing-02.txt

2007-12-04 Thread Glen Zorn
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. I have not found any security-related problems with this draft. These comments were written primarily for the enefit of the security area directors. Docume

RE: [HOKEY] Last Call: draft-ietf-hokey-erx (EAP Extensions for EAP Re-authentication Protocol (ERP)) to Proposed Standard

2008-02-03 Thread Glen Zorn
Dan Harkins <> scribbled on Saturday, February 02, 2008 8:46 AM: > Hello again, > > Pardon my repetition but I have come up with a very valid reason > why naming keys using HMAC-SHA-256 is a bad idea. > > If one wants to administratively remove all keys in a particular > key hierarchy (wh

RE: [HOKEY] Last Call: draft-ietf-hokey-erx (EAP Extensions for EAP Re-authentication Protocol (ERP)) to Proposed Standard

2008-02-03 Thread Glen Zorn
Lakshminath Dondeti <> scribbled on Sunday, February 03, 2008 1:30 PM: ... > There was also the issue of not being able to export EAP session IDs > (IIRC) that I referred to in my other message. Hmmm. draft-ietf-eap-keying-22.txt says EAP methods supporting key derivation and mutual authen

RE: [HOKEY] Last Call: draft-ietf-hokey-erx (EAP Extensions for EAP Re-authentication Protocol (ERP)) to Proposed Standard

2008-02-16 Thread Glen Zorn
... > Can you tell me one use for a key name that is an incomprehensible > string of random bits? > > "Delete all keys associated with 0x58d610a8ff4128c9" > > "uhm, ok" > > If not then don't you agree the current key naming scheme is > completely useless? I don't think that it's really

Re: I-D nroff macros

2000-01-04 Thread Glen Zorn
Alan Blount <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've been using the simple set of nroff macros, as described by > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/2-nroff.template > > While this works, I'd like to be able to autogenerate section numbers > and table of contents entries. This draft doesn't give

Re: 47th IETF: DRAFT AGENDA

2000-03-02 Thread Glen Zorn
At 03:16 PM 03/02/2000 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... >MONDAY, March 27, 2000 >0800-1930 IETF Registration - Foyer 1 >0800-0900 Continental Breakfast - Foyer and Circulation Area >0900-0930 Opening Plenary Session - Hall E >0930-1130 Morning Sessions > APP appareaApplications

UDP Echo and DiffServ bits

2000-08-07 Thread Glen Turner
statement on UDP Echo and DiffServ in an RFC or ID? Are there factors that would suggest that the UDP Echo service should not set the DiffServ bits? Ta, Glen [PS: I'm aware of the denial of service possibilities with UDP Echo, especially one that sets the DiffServ bits to

Re: [Re: Standartization of User Input for find\search engines]

2000-10-16 Thread Glen Turner
h interface of any type, including standards from ISO, IETF, W3C or anyone else. -- Glen Turner Network Engineer (08) 8303 3936 Australian Academic and Research Network [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.aarnet.edu.au/ -- The revolution will not be televised, it will be digitised

RE: Is it an error?

2001-03-08 Thread Glen Zorn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] writes: > In Rfc2868 (RADIUS Attributes for Tunnel Protocol Support), > Radius Attribute > 91 > is given to Tunnel-Server-Auth-ID. > However, In Rfc2888 (Secure Remote Access with L2TP),the same Radius > Attribute > 91 is given to IPSEC_MANDATE. > Is i

RE: IPv9 ??

2001-04-18 Thread Glen Morehead
formational" or "Experimental" RFCs. Regards, Glen -Original Message- From: Jiwoong Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 17 April 2001 21:35 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: IPv9 ?? What fun! I've heard a lot about IPv5, but it's first time to see IPv9! It se

FW: [AAA-WG]: Request for IETF last call on Diameter-11 and Transport-07 drafts

2002-06-27 Thread Glen Zorn
> Some time ago, Randy Bush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > > > > The AAA WG has completed WG last call on the Diameter Base-10 and > > > Transport-07 documents. As a result of WG last call comments, no > > > changes were made to the Transport document, and 20 changes were > > > made to the Di

Re: travel guide for the next IETF...

2013-01-04 Thread Glen Zorn
On 01/05/2013 06:17 AM, Ole Jacobsen wrote: > Mark, > > This location was "dictated" (if that's the right word) by a desire > to co-locate (back-to-back) with the IEEE. So if you don't attend IEEE, quit your whining: at least you won't have to eat he same hotel food for 2 weeks in a row...

Re: travel guide for the next IETF...

2013-01-04 Thread Glen Zorn
On 01/05/2013 11:51 AM, John Levine wrote: So if you don't attend IEEE, quit your whining: at least you won't >> have to eat he same hotel food for 2 weeks in a row... > > You don't have to eat there. Check out the reviews of this > restaurant across the street: > > https://plus.google.com/118

Re: travel guide for the next IETF...

2013-01-08 Thread Glen Zorn
On 01/07/2013 05:31 AM, Ole Jacobsen wrote: > On Sun, 6 Jan 2013, Michael Richardson wrote: >> >> yeah, I know, but I gotta say to the IEEE SERIOUSLY? > > Apparently the IEEE folks love it, have been there before. It was very nice (I am one of those IEEE folks) if you had a nice expense a

Re: Internet Draft Final Submission Cut-Off Today

2013-02-27 Thread Glen Zorn
On 02/27/2013 03:46 PM, Stefan Winter wrote: Hi, > >> [...] ferkakte [...] > > As a German, I'm now torn apart between being flattered that we've > successfully exported a German word to the U.S. and being > speechlessly shocked by the way spelling was b0rked in the process. I believe that it's

Re: On the tradition of I-D "Acknowledgements" sections

2013-03-24 Thread Glen Zorn
On 03/25/2013 09:23 AM, Joel M. Halpern wrote: I think I at least partly disagree. The acknowledgements section of RFCs was not, and to the best of my knowledge is not, concerned with capturing the history of where specific changes or ideas came from. It ought to be concerned with giving cred

Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?

2013-04-28 Thread Glen Zorn
On 04/29/2013 07:53 AM, Margaret Wasserman wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Apr 19, 2013, at 6:03 AM, t.p. wrote: >> If we required the IETF to reflect the diversity of people who >> are, e.g., IT network professionals, then the IETF would fall apart >> for lack of ability. > […] >> If the ADs of the

Re: Best list for IETF last calls [was: Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org]

2013-06-07 Thread Glen Zorn
On 06/08/2013 02:52 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: Rule 1 for complex and divergent mail threads is to change the Subject header when the subject changes. If you don't do that, your mail is rather likely to get junked. I think that IETF last call threads should stay on the main IETF discussion li

RE: Last Call: draft-harkins-emu-eap-pwd (EAP Authentication Using Only A Password) to Informational RFC

2010-02-28 Thread Glen Zorn
Dorothy Stanley [mailto:dstan...@arubanetworks.com] writes: I am submitting one comment on draft-harkins-emu-eap-pwd : (1) Channel bindings are becoming increasingly necessary for new and evolving uses of EAP. This point is certainly debatable, if for no other reason that the concept of "

comments on draft-maglione-radext-ipv6-acct-extensions-01

2010-03-08 Thread Glen Zorn
Not sure why this is Standards Track since both RFC 2866 & RFC 2869 are Informational. It would be more in-line w/RADIUS tradition to name the Attributes Acct-IPv6-* rather than IPv6-Acct-*. References are pointers to objects, not the objects themselves. Suggest changing all instances of constru

RE: Bar Bof on Federated Authentication Thursday at 9 PM during IETF week

2010-03-09 Thread Glen Zorn
Sam Hartman [hartmans-i...@mit.edu] writes: > Folks, I'm trying to get a room for the federated authentication bar BOF > Thursday March 25 at 9 PM US Pacific time I've requested a room from the > secretariat and Pasi said he would approve the request, so we'll see > what their availability is. >

RE: Last Call: Policy Statement on the Day Pass Experiment

2010-05-06 Thread Glen Zorn
Looks OK to me. Hope this helps. ~gwz > -Original Message- > From: ietf-announce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-announce- > boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of The IESG > Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 5:08 AM > To: IETF; IETF Announce > Cc: IESG > Subject: Last Call: Policy Statement on the Day P

RE: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht

2010-05-07 Thread Glen Zorn
> Hi, Jari, > > Individual shop owners (and cab drivers) can always do what they want > (anywhere), even when the company they work for accepts cards. > > As I noted, you can ask before you get into the cab. More than once, I _have_ asked the driver specifically if he accepts credit cards (the a

RE: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht

2010-05-09 Thread Glen Zorn
Iljitsch van Beijnum [mailto:iljit...@muada.com] writes: > On 8 mei 2010, at 1:50, Glen Zorn wrote: > > > More than once, I _have_ asked the driver specifically if he accepts > credit > > cards (the advertised policy notwithstanding) only to have him refuse > it > >

RE: draft-douglass-timezone-xml-00 & Presence

2010-07-06 Thread Glen Zorn
Cyrus Daboo [mailto://cy...@daboo.name] writes: > --On July 6, 2010 2:39:09 PM -0500 "James M. Polk" > wrote: > > > How is this unique wrt to what Presence has provided in XML for 4-6 > > years? A comparison is at least preferable to what already exists for > > timezones in XML, IMO. > > Can yo

RE: IETF Attendance by continent

2010-08-08 Thread Glen Zorn
Bob Hinden [mailto://bob.hin...@gmail.com] writes: > During my IAOC chair plenary talk at IETF78 (slides are in the > proceedings) I asked a question about continuing the current meeting > policy (3 in North America, 2 in Europe, 1 in Asia in two year period > (3-2-1) ) or changing to a 1-1-1 poli

RE: IETF Attendance by continent

2010-08-09 Thread Glen Zorn
Michael Richardson [mailto://m...@sandelman.ca] writes: ... > > "Michael" == Michael StJohns writes: > Michael> Fred said this much more eloquently than I could. > > Michael> On the IETF78 attendees list there's been a lot of > Michael> discussion about where to meet - with the

Brief Maintenance Outage Coming Up

2010-08-12 Thread Glen Barney
is necessary to perform physical and infrastructure upgrades at the primary data center serving the community. All services are expected to be back in service by 12:20 Pacific (1520 EDT/1920 GMT). Thank you for your patience with this outage. Glen Glen Barney IT Director AMS (IETF/RFCP

RE: Tourist or business visa from US?

2010-08-24 Thread Glen Zorn
I've been to China at least 10 times (5 in my current passport; can't find the old ones just now). At no time did any Immigration personnel speak to, let alone interrogate, me; they just checked the visa, stamped my passport & let me through. Hope this helps. ~gwz From: ietf-boun...@i

RE: Tourist or business visa from US?

2010-08-25 Thread Glen Zorn
Dave Crocker [mailto://dcroc...@bbiw.net] writes: > On 8/24/2010 8:28 AM, Mary Barnes wrote: > > My question then is whether you tell them at border control that you > are > > attending a meeting or whether you are there on vacation. I am > unfortunately > > not a good liar ;) > > > Let me ge

RE: [78attendees] WARNING !!! Re: Maastricht to Brussels-Nat-Aero, Sat 07:09

2010-08-28 Thread Glen Zorn
Scott Brim [mailto://scott.b...@gmail.com] writes: > On 08/28/2010 03:27 EDT, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: > > Hi Olaf, > > > > What I'm saying is that this has been done wrong, and probably the > only way > > to avoid it is to: > > > > 1) Not accepting a venue which is not "directly" connected (an

RE: [78attendees] WARNING !!! Re: Maastricht to Brussels-Nat-Aero, Sat 07:09

2010-08-28 Thread Glen Zorn
Sounds to me as if you both just need a good travel agent (& possibly a little anti-whining therapy ;-). Hope this helps. ~gwz > -Original Message- > From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > JORDI PALET MARTINEZ > Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2010 3:57 AM >

RE: [78attendees] WARNING !!! Re: Maastricht to Brussels-Nat-Aero, Sat 07:09

2010-08-29 Thread Glen Zorn
Ole Jacobsen [mailto:o...@cisco.com] writes: > On Sun, 29 Aug 2010, Yoav Nir wrote: > > > > Hopefully. But only the two hotels listed there have agreements and > > special rates for IETF attendants. In Maastricht there were a lot of > > hotels with special rates, so a lot were listed. >

RE: Dedicated list for technical discussions

2010-08-29 Thread Glen Zorn
Mark Nottingham [mailto://m...@mnot.net] writes: > I know it's been brought up many times before, but I'd appreciate a > separate list for technical discussions regarding drafts, etc., since > this list seems to have become a travel tips forum. I'm sure that if you have some specific technical to

RE: [78attendees] WARNING !!! Re: Maastricht to Brussels-Nat-Aero, Sat 07:09

2010-08-29 Thread Glen Zorn
Yoav Nir [mailto:y...@checkpoint.com] writes: > On Aug 29, 2010, at 10:31 AM, Glen Zorn wrote: > > > > Lonely Planet? Google? Ask someone who has been there? Wait a couple > > > of weeks and see what the host comes up with? > > > > Again, that's not th

RE: [78attendees] WARNING !!! Re: Maastricht to Brussels-Nat-Aero, Sat 07:09

2010-08-29 Thread Glen Zorn
Yoav Nir [mailto:y...@checkpoint.com] writes: On Aug 29, 2010, at 10:31 AM, Glen Zorn wrote: Ole Jacobsen [mailto:o...@cisco.com] writes: > On Sun, 29 Aug 2010, Yoav Nir wrote: > > > > Hopefully. But only the two hotels listed there have agreements and > > s

RE: [78attendees] WARNING !!! Re: Maastricht to Brussels-Nat-Aero, Sat 07:09

2010-08-29 Thread Glen Zorn
Randall Gellens [mailto://ra...@qualcomm.com] writes: > At 11:32 PM -0700 8/28/10, Ole Jacobsen wrote: > > > Food (outside of the major international hotels) is VERY cheap in > > Beijing, as in less than $20 for a 5-course meal for 2 including > > beer. Beer in a grocery store is about 25 US c

RE: [78attendees] WARNING !!! Re: Maastricht to Brussels-Nat-Aero, Sat 07:09

2010-08-30 Thread Glen Zorn
Randall Gellens [mailto:ra...@qualcomm.com] writes: > At 10:06 AM +0700 8/30/10, Glen Zorn wrote: > > > > Are there any smoke-free restaurants near the site, or even > anywhere > >> in Beijing? > > > > Don't worry: the Disneyfication of the planet

RE: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance by continent

2010-08-31 Thread Glen Zorn
Hadriel Kaplan [mailto://hkap...@acmepacket.com] writes: ... > > > > Why Kauai? You list detailed reasons why Hawaii is logical and > > solves for many of the problems, but you don't say why this island. > > Because it's the nicest, obviously. :) I strongly disagree: the leeward coast of Maui

RE: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance by continent

2010-09-01 Thread Glen Zorn
Clint Chaplin [mailto:clint.chap...@gmail.com] writes: > On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 9:15 PM, Randall Gellens > wrote: > > At 10:08 AM +0700 9/1/10, Glen Zorn wrote: > > > >>  > > Why Kauai?  You list detailed reasons why Hawaii is logical and > >>> >

RE: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance by continent

2010-09-06 Thread Glen Zorn
Christer Holmberg [mailto:christer.holmb...@ericsson.com] writes: > Hi, > > I assume Hawaii has the same visa issues as the rest of US... Of course, and the same heavily armed ICE agents. As an aside, the only other place I've ever encountered armed border guards was at the Austrian/Slovakian b

RE: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance by continent

2010-09-06 Thread Glen Zorn
Yoav Nit [mailto://y...@checkpoint.com] writes: ... > I would go so far as to say that getting a US visa seems easier than > getting one to China. Who are the people for whom it's easier to visit a > European country than it is to visit the US? Umm, Americans? I have lived outside the US for ab

RE: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance by continent

2010-09-06 Thread Glen Zorn
Christer Holmberg [mailto://christer.holmb...@ericsson.com] writes: > I guess the chinese (and other affected nationalities) can speak for > themselves, but as far as I know it is not that easy to get a US visa - > even with company backup etc. I have never heard about people having > problems get

RE: Optimizing for what? Was Re: IETF Attendance by continent

2010-09-06 Thread Glen Zorn
Tim Bray [mailto:tb...@textuality.com] writes: I should point out that Canada has most of the logistical advantages the usa enjoys, while imposing quite a bit less visa pain. Well, yes, except that in my experience direct international flight to Canada are a lot more expensive than international

RE: All these discussions about meeting venues

2010-09-12 Thread Glen Zorn
Michael Dillon [mailto://wavetos...@googlemail.com] writes: ... > > I am really uninterested in discussing the Maastricht situation > > further except insofar as I think there are lessons in it that > > have not been absorbed yet. > > I wonder why an attendee who arrived late was left begging at

RE: All these discussions about meeting venues

2010-09-14 Thread Glen Zorn
Mary Barnes [mailto://mary.ietf.bar...@gmail.com]> writes: Glen, > > I had zero expectation that Maastricht would be anything like the city > I live in. However, it never crossed my mind to think that the city > would be so deserted when I arrived, nor that I would end up on t

RE: Mail regarding draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis

2010-10-14 Thread Glen Zorn
Including the IETF list because the draft in question is in IETF LC. Hope this helps. ~gwz From: LIU Hans [mailto:hans@alcatel-lucent.com] Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 10:09 AM To: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588...@tools.ietf.org Subject: Mail regarding draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis D

RE: [Dime] Mail regarding draft-ietf-dime-rfc4005bis

2010-10-14 Thread Glen Zorn
Glen Zorn [mailto://g...@net-zen.net] writes: ... > > My apologies, I was mistakingly believing that the previous > discussions > > on this topic had lead to the adoption of Route-Record AVPs in > answers. > > I'm not at all sure that you were mistaken about that,

RE: what is the problem bis

2010-10-30 Thread Glen Zorn
Keith Moore [mailto://mo...@network-heretics.com] writes: > On Oct 29, 2010, at 12:36 PM, Michael Richardson wrote: > > > In-person meeting time is used regularly for powerpoints rather than > discussion. > > +1. > > The single biggest thing that IETF could do to raise productivity in > meeting

RE: Problem with draft-sheffer-emu-eap-eke

2010-11-17 Thread Glen Zorn
Looks OK to me. Hope this helps. ~gwz > -Original Message- > From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Yaron Sheffer > Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 6:14 PM > To: ietf@ietf.org > Subject: Re: Problem with draft-sheffer-emu-eap-eke > > Expanding on

RE: Last Call: (Prohibiting SSL Version 2.0) to Proposed Standard

2010-12-01 Thread Glen Zorn
Section 3 says "TLS clients MUST NOT send SSL 2.0 CLIENT-HELLO messages." and "TLS servers MUST NOT negotiate or use SSL 2.0" and later "TLS servers that do not support SSL 2.0 MAY accept version 2.0 CLIENT-HELLO messages as the first message of a TLS handshake for interoperability with old clients

RE: [TLS] Last Call: (Prohibiting SSL Version 2.0) to Proposed Standard

2010-12-02 Thread Glen Zorn
Michael D'Errico [mailto:mike-l...@pobox.com] writes: > Glen Zorn wrote: > > Section 3 says "TLS clients MUST NOT send SSL 2.0 CLIENT-HELLO > messages." > > and "TLS servers MUST NOT negotiate or use SSL 2.0" and later "TLS > servers > >

RE: [TLS] Last Call:

2010-12-02 Thread Glen Zorn
Martin Rex [mailto:m...@sap.com] writes: > Glen Zorn wrote: > > > > > Glen Zorn wrote: > > > > Section 3 says "TLS clients MUST NOT send SSL 2.0 CLIENT-HELLO > > > messages." > > > > and "TLS servers MUST NOT negotiate or use SSL

RE: Last Call: (Prohibiting SSL Version 2.0) to Proposed Standard

2010-12-02 Thread Glen Zorn
Joe Salowey [mailto:jsalo...@cisco.com] writes: > Hi Glen, > > In reading the text and I'm not exactly sure where the confusion or > contradiction comes in. I think your suggested text is fine, but I'm > not sure how it improves things. If I understand your point cor

RE: [TLS] Last Call:

2010-12-10 Thread Glen Zorn
Looks good to me. Hope this helps. ~gwz > -Original Message- > From: Sean Turner [mailto:turn...@ieca.com] > Sent: Saturday, December 11, 2010 4:36 AM > To: t...@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org > Cc: m...@sap.com; Glen Zorn > Subject: Re: [TLS] Last Call: > > On 12/3

secdir review of draft-groves-mikey-sakke-00

2011-01-30 Thread Glen Zorn
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like a

test, please ignore

2011-03-09 Thread Glen Zorn
___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Test, please ignore

2011-04-11 Thread Glen Barney
Test, please ignore. Glen Glen Barney IT Director AMS (IETF Secretariat) ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Re: Revising I-Ds became painful

2011-04-20 Thread Glen Zorn
On 4/21/2011 12:18 AM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote: > Hi, > It seems like I-D submission for a revised draft (after expiration) > encounters > so many new hurdles: > > 1. Version number. Submission page complains about the version number even > though it is correct. This seems to be because the sy

Re: [paws] WG Review: Protocol to Access White Space database (paws)

2011-04-21 Thread Glen Zorn
On 4/21/2011 8:05 PM, scott.proba...@nokia.com wrote: > Hi, > > I agree with the concept, just want to be sure the PAWS is not expected to > develop these security mechanisms (i.e. the tools) as contrasted to including > or using in PAWS the security tools developed by appropriate expert groups

Re: Last Call: (Secure PSK Authentication for IKE) to Informational RFC

2011-04-21 Thread Glen Zorn
On 4/22/2011 7:54 AM, Dan Harkins wrote: > > Hi Mykyta, > > Thank you for reviewing my draft. Responses inline > > On Sat, March 26, 2011 10:06 pm, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote: >> Hello, >> >> A question on the flowing extract: >> >>> This memo contains a new numberspace to be managed by I

REMINDER - IETF OUTAGE SCHEDULED FOR TODAY, MONDAY APRIL 25TH

2011-04-24 Thread Glen Barney
kept constantly apprised of any delays, and AMS (IETF Secretariat) staff will be working continuously until the process is completed. Please be prepared for this outage today, and plan accordingly. Thank you all for your patience as we bring this upgrade and test to a close. Glen Glen Barn

Reminder - Contacting the IETF

2011-04-24 Thread Glen Barney
secretariat and report problems can be seen at: http://www.ietf.org/secretariat/ All community members should be aware of this contact information, in the event it is ever required. As always, if there are any questions, please let us know. Glen Glen Barney IT Director AMS (IETF Secretariat

We are back online!

2011-04-25 Thread Glen Barney
Dear IETF Membership - Our failover/failback/upgrade procedures have all been completed, and we are now running on our newly-upgraded primary production servers once again. Thank you all for your patience and support during this time. Regards, Glen Glen Barney IT Director AMS (IETF Secretariat

Re: Getting to Quebec City

2011-06-17 Thread Glen Zorn
On 6/18/2011 7:08 AM, John Levine wrote: > As you may have noticed, flying to Quebec City (YQB) is incredibly > expensive. Hmm. My ticket to QC was only ~$40 CAD > than the equivalent one to Montreal, far less than R/T bus or train fare... ... <>___

  1   2   3   >