Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02

On 8/26/05, Hallam-Baker, Phillip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Let me phrase it this way: the IESG should not sanction conflicting > > experiments by publishing conflicting specifications, > > I agree. > > But I do not believe that SPF and Sender-ID conflict in any way > whatsoever and this was

Re: [spfbis] Last Call: (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard

The issue Måns Nilsson raises was discussed extensively on the SPFbis list prior to as well as during last call on the list and I believe the appropriate decision was reached by the working group. If there is any doubt in the minds of the IESG regarding whether the working group reached the correct