I have a question about the use of STUN, as a way of discovering IP
address(es), in draft-ietf-geopriv-res-gw-lis-discovery.
Section 4.1 refers to STUN by way of RFC 5389, but reading both the present
draft and 5389 leaves one critical item unspecified:
oWhat domain name is to be used, in
On 9/12/13 2:07 PM, "Ted Lemon" wrote:
>On Sep 12, 2013, at 1:49 PM, "Dickson, Brian"
>wrote:
>> In order to subvert or redirect a delegation, the TLD operator (or
>> registrar) would need to change the DNS server name/IP, and replace the
>>DS
>>
On 9/12/13 7:24 AM, "Theodore Ts'o" wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 03:38:21PM -0400, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
>> > I disagree. DNSSEC is not just DNS: its the only available,
>>deployed, and
>> > (mostly) accessible global PKI currently in existence which also
>>includes a
>> > constrained p
