; To: ietf@ietf.org
> > Cc: Flemming Andreasen; Ingemar Johansson S;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Christer
> > Holmberg
> > Subject: RE: [MMUSIC] Last Call:
> > draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-capability-negotiation(SDP Capability
> > Negotiation) to Proposed Standard
> >
Hi,
The intention is not to "mandate" that MSRP allows man in the middle attacks.
The text simply states that it doesn't change what can already be done.
If you think that the text gives a wrong picture regarding that, and what is
possible what to protect with SIP, I am happy to modify the tex
Hi,
I am not I understand what this draft has to do with MITM attacks. This is
related to which MSRP UA becomes "active", by applying COMEDIA.
ACM is a separate thing from SESSMATCH - which is the reason the WG decided to
split it into two drafts in the first place (originally ACM and SESSMATC
Hi Ted,
>I join Richard in believing that this document makes changes
>beyond that which could be understood as "updating" the MSRP
>URI scheme processing.
>
>To highlight one particular aspect, RFC 4975 does not require
>session-ids to be present, a fact noted both in the ABNF and
>in this
-
> From: Ted Hardie [mailto:ted.i...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 29. kesäkuuta 2010 20:37
> To: Christer Holmberg
> Cc: Richard L. Barnes; sec...@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org; The
> IETF; draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sessma...@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sess
+1.
Regards,
Christer
> -Original Message-
> From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Jari Arkko
> Sent: 10. elokuuta 2010 9:20
> To: IETF discussion list
> Subject: Re: IETF Attendance by continent
>
> FWIW, I do think that choice of July as the meet
Hi,
The purpose of this e-mail is to address the secdir comments given by Richard
Barnes and Ted Hardie. Due to summer vacations, standardization meetings
etc it took a while to put the e-mail together, and we appologise for that.
GENERAL
===
First, the draft does NOT propose any changes to
Hi,
I agree with Jari.
In my opinion, the discussion whether we should change the meeting calendar
(not having meetings during summer vacation months etc) was much more
interesting and useful.
Regards,
Christer
> -Original Message-
> From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...
Hi Ted,
Comments inline.
>Thanks for your message and your consideration of the points I raised.
>Given the scope of changes below, my first suggestion is that the author team
>actually
>go ahead with a draft incorporating these changes, so that we can discuss
>based on the actual text. I also
Hi Cullen,
>Do these changes allow an SBC on the signaling path to change the contents of
>the MSRP messages
>without the end points being able to detect that? I'm sure it will be easier
>to answer this once we have
>a new draft.
Sessmatch does not make it any easier for an SBC in the signall
Hi,
I assume Hawaii has the same visa issues as the rest of US...
Regards,
Christer
> -Original Message-
> From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Andrew G. Malis
> Sent: 6. syyskuuta 2010 1:39
> To: Glen Zorn
> Cc: Randall Gellens; IETF-Discussion
ICE? So, that's the reason why it takes forever to enter US. They use RFC 5245
at the border...
Regards,
Christer
> -Original Message-
> From: Glen Zorn [mailto:g...@net-zen.net]
> Sent: 6. syyskuuta 2010 10:21
> To: Christer Holmberg; 'Andrew G. Malis&#
nues.
> Even if they're in a cold place like Minneapolis.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Christer Holmberg
> Sent: 06 September 2010 08:17
> To: Andrew G. Malis; Glen Zorn
> Cc: Randall Gelle
>>Personally I don't care that much where the meetings take place - I am
>>more interested WHEN they take place. For me it is the PEOPLE that
>>make a meeting good or bad - not the location. There are people
>>working in much worse conditions than we are, and still
>>they manage to
>>do a gr
Hi,
I think Ben gave my clarification :)
Regards,
Christer
> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Campbell [mailto:b...@estacado.net]
> Sent: 9. syyskuuta 2010 1:15
> To: Christer Holmberg; Cullen Jennings
> Cc: draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sessma...@tools.ietf.org; Ted
>
Hi,
>One suggestion for Beijing where the level of English with bus/taxi drivers
>etc will be low maybe to publish a page linked from the main meeting page with
>something like "Can you please take me to the
>Shangri-La Hotel" in Chinese so attendees can just print it out and hand it to
>the
Hi,
Based on the secdir comments/discussions regarding sessmatch, we have submitted
a new version of the draft (-07).
The major changes are:
- It is clarified that the MSRP URI comparison rules are not changed, and
that the rules are not used for session matching
- It is clarifie
Hi,
>>I might add that if the excluded party feels this is oppressive, I am
>>sorry. It is not intended to be. But, at some level, sooner or later,
>>you have to be willing to say "I'm the problem here, not the remaining
>>999 people who have lesser constraints"
>
>So, if some venues work qui
Hi Roni,
>Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as a Standard track RFC.
>
>Major issues:
>
>
>Minor issues:
>
>1. In the document you mention that the keep alive can be negotiated in each
>direction. I understand the dialog case, is this true
>for the case of registration, if yes
Cullen,
When we last talked, you said that your main is the fact that unreliable
responses might be sent even in the case of Require:100rel. That has now been
solved, so I am very surprised by your comments.
Also, the draft WAS back in the WG when the proposed solution was presented.
Why didn
>>* There is no usable bus from the airport (it runs only at commuter
>> hours) and a taxi costs C$32.50
>
>You're absolutely right about this. The people of Québec are
>not happy about this situation and often complain in the
>media. It makes for a bad first impression. We'll try to
>organ
>>In any case, the IRTF Report, IAB Report and RSOC Report could certainly be
>>made in the other plenary.
>
>Or omitted entirely, since they are duplicative of data which would be better
>communicated in writing.
...and/or use some Internet technology, by producing YouTube report videos,
that p
...and, at least in this case, if you look at similar hotels (e.g. the Starwood
properties) in the area, you'll find that even the current
pre-book-non-refundable-no-breakfast-in-some-cases-no-internet rates will be
higher than the rate offered to us.
There are also cheaper hotels, so it's a
Hi,
Also note that, according to Google maps, it is possible to take a bus from the
overflow hotel to the meeting. It requires a 400 meters walk from the hotel to
the bus stop, but that should be managble even for an IETF attendee...
The total travel (walking+bus) is 13 minutes.
Regards,
Ch
Hi,
Sometimes the drafts says that something SHOULD be done, but the justification
is unclear to the reader, so it can be difficult to interpret the meaning
correctly.
So, I think it would cause less confusion if drafts made a better job of
describing WHY something is a SHOULD, or MUST.
Somet
cording to Google Maps), and
the distance is not that far.
Also note that there ARE other alternative hotels, closer to the meeting.
Regards,
Christer
> -Original Message-
> From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Christer Holmberg
> Sent: Wed
> Cheaper, yes. Easier?
>
> Sure, a 5-hour flight to Paris sure beats a 12-hour flight to New York
> plus a 4 hour flight to
> Minneapolis, but you end up in Paris, and if the conference hotel is
> too expensive for your
> corporate budget (it usually is for m
Hi,
I don't have an opinion regarding the number of f2f meetings. But, as we've
discussed before, I think we could make more out of the summer meetings
(considering any e-mail etc activities taking place before and after them) by
moving them away from the main summer vacation period.
So, no m
I am sure these are the kind of "discussions" people had in mind when they
suggested that we should make better and more effective use of the e-mail lists
for our work in IETF...
Regards,
Christer
From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On
Hi,
I've been to China a few times, entering 2 different airports, and personally
I've never had any issues with immigration. It's always been fast and without
hassle.
No what-are-you-doing-here type of questions. No look-into-the-camera. No
put-your-finger-here. Only a quick look at the pass
Hi,
Why couldn't remote participants register to the meeting like all other
participants?
Remote participation would of course still be free, but it would allow remote
participants to subscribe to the attendee list in the same way as other
participants.
In addition, it would provide better kn
: Christer Holmberg [christer.holmb...@ericsson.com]
CC: John C Klensin [john-i...@jck.com]; ietf@ietf.org [ietf@ietf.org]
Subject: Re: Remote participants access to Meeting Mailing Lists was Re: BOF
posters in the welcome reception
Hi Christer,
At 13:54 24-07-2013, Christer Holmberg wrote:
>
32 matches
Mail list logo
