On Aug 2, 2013, at 9:58 PM, SM wrote:
Hello SM,
> Hi Chris,
> At 13:59 01-08-2013, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> Re the Trust's plenary slides (I was not in Berlin):
>>
>> I have an allergy to modifying the Trust Agreement unless there's an
>> overwhelming reason to do so. It was a very hard-won
s/slides-87-iesg-opsplenary-4
Thank you and we look forward to getting your feedback.
Chris Griffiths
Chair, IETF Trust
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
On Aug 1, 2013, at 10:59 PM, Brian E Carpenter
wrote:
Hi Brian,
> Re the Trust's plenary slides (I was not in Berlin):
>
> I have an allergy to modifying the Trust Agreement unless there's an
> overwhelming reason to do so. It was a very hard-won piece of text.
I recognize that this was a ver
On Aug 2, 2013, at 4:23 AM, John C Klensin wrote:
> FWIW, I share Brian's concern and reasoning about these
> questions (and his allergy). I might have a lower threshold of
> necessity as a requirement for changing the agreement, but I'm
> not convinced -- from either the slide or what I could
On Aug 5, 2013, at 7:08 AM, Olaf Kolkman wrote:
>
> On Aug 3, 2013, at 8:48 AM, Chris Griffiths wrote:
>
>> IETF Community,
>>
>> The IETF Trust Trustees would like feedback from the community on several
>> issues:
>> - We have received reque
for them. While not huge numbers, we want to
raise the issue that keeping these items requires overhead and expense that
seems to not be warranted in some cases, and we want to discussed and get
feedback on if keeping these and paying for them makes sense.
Thanks
> Tom Petch
>
> --
On Sep 24, 2013, at 6:11 PM, SM wrote:
Hello SM,
> At 23:48 02-08-2013, Chris Griffiths wrote:
>> Issue 1
>>
>> We have recently been asked permission to republish the TAO with a creative
>> commons license, but according to counsel, the current trust agreement doe
On Sep 26, 2013, at 3:12 PM, Chris Griffiths wrote:
> On Sep 24, 2013, at 6:11 PM, SM wrote:
>
>> At 23:48 02-08-2013, Chris Griffiths wrote:
>>> Issue 1
>>>
>>> We have recently been asked permission to republish the TAO with a creative
>>>
On Oct 9, 2013, at 2:07 PM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> I have become confused between the permission necessary to republish the Tao,
> and the request to republish under a Creative Commons license.
>
> Can I try to clarify.
>
> Do we or do we not grant permission for others to publis
