I agree with this initiative.
Alejandro,
On 2/22/13, IETF Chair wrote:
> Jari has created a blog as an experiment to see if would be possible to
> provide periodic status reports and other thoughts from the chair. Here's
> the link:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/blog/2013/02/chairs-blog/
>
>
rse, there are many exceptions). Did
you know that young people do not use email as much as us?. Saying
that, this can be a good way to bring young people to IETF.
Alejandro Acosta,
{...}
Hi,
I want to support Mikael's comment.
Meetecho worked really well, I used to connect using a regular
jabber client however using Meetecho really enriches the experience,
it was very nice to see the slides, to be in the jabber room,
everything in the same screen. I also had audio (In a previou
Hello,
Just a small comment:
On 5/23/13, Jari Arkko wrote:
>
> For what it is worth, I wanted to provide my perspective on this. I of
> course believe that it is important that the IETF reaches out to an even
{...}
> Just meeting in some place does not bring too many new participants, at
> le
ies might be an excellent starting point.
I wonder if you have some ideas to shares in how to do this.
Thanks,
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Edwin
Alejandro Acosta,
>
> On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Melinda Shore
> wrote:
>
>> On 5/26/13 12:08 PM, SM wrote:
>
+1
I also support the idea of every RFC havving the associated wiki.
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On Sep 16, 2011, at 9:39 AM, Keith Moore wrote:
>
> > On Sep 16, 2011, at 10:52 AM, Cyrus Daboo wrote:
> >
> >> Again I would like to bring up the idea of every RFC having
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Keith Moore wrote:
> On Sep 19, 2011, at 12:27 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>
> > On 9/19/11 10:14 AM, Alejandro Acosta wrote:
> >> +1
> >> I also support the idea of every RFC havving the associated wiki.
> >
> > I think
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Marshall Eubanks <
marshall.euba...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Alejandro Acosta <
> alejandroacostaal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Keith Moore
>>
Hi Nathaniel,
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Nathaniel Borenstein
wrote:
>
> Is there any reason we can't create this on wikipedia itself, e.g.:
>
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RFC3514
>
The problem that I see in this case was mentioned previously by Keith and
Hector, wikipedia docs
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:29 PM, David Morris wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2011, George, Wes wrote:
>
>> > From: Joel jaeggli [mailto:joe...@bogus.com]
>>
>> > > At least, we should start *trying* to get IPv6 service from hotels.
>> > > We may have a very hard time getting it, but the fact that cus
Hi All,
In my humble opinion I totally agree with Arturo. So far I do know
several cities in Latin America and I believe Sao Paulo (Brazil) or
Cancun (Mexico) might be a good options. Of course there are many more
good cities, those ware the first two that came to my mind.
I hope IETF 100 can b
On 7/26/13, John C Klensin wrote:
> Hi.
>
> For a newcomer or someone expecting to write I-Ds, some of the
> most important sessions at the IETF are the various Sunday
> afternoon tutorials and introductions. Many of them are (or
> should be) of as much interest to remote participants as to f2f
>
Hi Vinayak,
First, well done, I fully agree with your email. I have two
questions for you/the group:
1) I wonder if in your proposal you are considering some sort of
charge for remote participation. IMHO I do not think we are yet
prepare to charge.
2) When you mention that filling the responses
On 8/12/13, Vinayak Hegde wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Alejandro Acosta
> wrote:
>> Hi Vinayak,
>> First, well done, I fully agree with your email. I have two
>> questions for you/the group:
>> I would add to your proposal some kind of activiti
14 matches
Mail list logo
