I believe that last calls must stay on this ietf list.
Any last-call-only list must be *in addition* to the ietf list, with all
announcements crossposted, and anyone sensitive to general discussion can
subscribe to that instead.
Last calls need wide exposure.
(I'm acked in at least one RFC as
On Jun 7, 2013, at 10:49 AM, Thomas Narten wrote:
> What the weekly stats really ought to tally up is the readers/postings
> ratio, so that folk would get more direct feedback as to whether what they are
> posting is actually being read...
>
> My strong suspicion would be that there is strong ne
On Jun 8, 2013, at 6:09 AM, wrote:
> I believe that last calls must stay on this ietf list.
>
> Any last-call-only list must be *in addition* to the ietf list, with all
> announcements crossposted, and anyone sensitive to general discussion can
> subscribe to that instead.
>
> Last calls ne
AB,
This may surprise you, but not everyone cares what you think.
John
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 8, 2013, at 1:51 AM, "Abdussalam Baryun"
wrote:
> Dear Routing Area AD,
>
> I had many comments/issues regarding your area always addressed to you
> and including this issue which I hope my al
At 15:58 07-06-2013, John C Klensin wrote:
And it is getting to that conclusion from the above that often
troubles me about the posting summary list rankings. Assuming a
significant issues shows up on the list, whether in conjunction
with a Last Call or something else. Posting a comment and the
On 6/8/13 10:09 AM, SM wrote:
> As an off-topic comment, there are are alternative ways in making a
> decision; the best judgement of the most experienced or IETF Consensus.
I don't think it's off-topic. Consensus (rough or otherwise) requires
that at some point people can live with decisions wit
On 09/06/2013 07:55, Melinda Shore wrote:
> On 6/8/13 10:09 AM, SM wrote:
>> As an off-topic comment, there are are alternative ways in making a
>> decision; the best judgement of the most experienced or IETF Consensus.
>
> I don't think it's off-topic. Consensus (rough or otherwise) requires
> t
Hi,
I'm not sure how the desire for IETF Last Call discussions
to be on a dedicated and constrained mailing list in any way
implies that this generalized and unconstrained list is somehow a failure.
Filtering by subject line is unreliable.
For example, please provide a filter that will
not have a
On 09/06/2013 13:20, Andy Bierman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not sure how the desire for IETF Last Call discussions
> to be on a dedicated and constrained mailing list in any way
> implies that this generalized and unconstrained list is somehow a failure.
>
> Filtering by subject line is unreliable.
>
