On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> Section 3.2.1.1 of this document ("Kerberos V5 as a security triple") seems
> to indicate that it is mandatory for a conformant NFSv4 implementation to
> implement the Kerberos V5 GSS-API mechanism and a few "security triples"
> (mechanism,q
The -07 version of this draft resolves all of the issues raised by the Gen-ART
review of the -06 version. Discussion of the review with the authors has
resulted in a common understanding that there is no need for additional text
on statically allowing all source addresses through all links in a se
I would suggest it is always both. The trend was back to centralization,
but as the devices become more powerful, distributed (offloading, P2P, P2B)
methods are considered again. A constant battle of having a terminal vs
frontend gui client
Facebook itself seems to be reverting to traditiona
this late but I thought I'd comment on one part of it.
On 3/20/13 3:36 PM, Jari Arkko wrote:
I think it is mostly market forces and historical reasons, and the development
of the IETF to focus on more particular core aspects of the Internet (like
routing) as opposed to what the small shops mi
Joel,
> Different doesn't generally mean good, in the peering case.
>
> There are plenty of examples of monopoly PTTs or regulators engaging in
> behavior that impacts the usability of or availability of traffic exchange,
> there's all sorts of market failures, and there's deliberately uncompet
Total of 99 messages in the last 7 days.
script run at: Fri Apr 5 00:53:06 EDT 2013
Messages | Bytes| Who
+--++--+
6.06% |6 | 5.52% |45474 | s...@resistor.net
5.05% |5 | 4.08% |33620 | fg...@si6network
