>>Any comments on the content of the draft?
I would go further - first to define by exclusion, secondly to define
a new class of providers (according tro common uisage) so that
discussion can proceed
An ISP _hosts_ its own and customer's hosts. Hosts follow the
hosts requirements RFC, at l
Jon;
> >>Any comments on the content of the draft?
>
> I would go further - first to define by exclusion, secondly to define
> a new class of providers (according tro common uisage) so that
> discussion can proceed
My intention is to provide a semi permanent definition as an Informational
RF
On Fri, 7 Jul 2000, Rosie Drugeault wrote:
> why don't you come along to WAPconvention 2000 and give our delegates that
> warm fuzzy feeling with the real story?
'Cos I've got better things to do with my time than go to conventions. ;-)
Tatty bye,
Jim'll
>> I would go further - first to define by exclusion, secondly to define
>> a new class of providers (according tro common uisage) so that
>> discussion can proceed
>
> My intention is to provide a semi permanent definition as an Informational
> RFC.
>
> It is important to make the definition p
MPLS Global Summit taking place October 3-4, 2000 at the Fairmont Copley
Plaza in Boston, MA.
As you may know this is ICM's third MPLS event. The program has been
recognized as one of the leading industry events. The most recent gathering
in San Diego attracted approximately 250 representati
> of course you will exuse the providers if we continue to be perverse and
> find new business models.
not bloody likely. some things are inexcusable. munging data in
transit is one of them. the fact that you may have a business
model that says you can make money doing something that is inexcu
At 21.43 -0400 00-07-10, Keith Moore wrote:
>not bloody likely. some things are inexcusable. munging data in
>transit is one of them. the fact that you may have a business
>model that says you can make money doing something that is inexcusable
>is not a justification for doing that thing.
I do
>> of course you will exuse the providers if we continue to be perverse and
>> find new business models.
>
> not bloody likely. some things are inexcusable. munging data in
> transit is one of them. the fact that you may have a business
> model that says you can make money doing something that
