Vint;
> that's right - they use iMODE on the DOCOMO mobiles. iMODE and
> WAP seem to have that in common: a non-IP radio link protocol
> and an application gateway. Of course, this limits the applications
> to those that can be "translated" in the gateway, while an end to
> end system (such as th
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Masataka Ohta ty
ped:
>> Is it fair if providers using iMODE or WAP are advertised
>> to be ISPs?
>>
>> Is it fair if providers using NAT are advertised to be ISPs?
>>
>>My answer to both questions is
>>
>> No, while they may be Internet S
Robert;
> WAP and i-mode are *very* different.
FTP and SMTP are *very* different, because SMTP is a lot easier to
pass application/transport gateways.
However, the question of whether it is IP or not is enough to dismiss
iMODE and WAP.
The battle has been and still is fought between the end to
Masataka Ohta wrote:
> > i-mode uses native
> > http servers with some relatively transparent html
> > extensions for handsets (such as http://www.ecal.com |My opinions are my own.|
|Chief Scientist |=|
|eCal Corp. |"If nobody believes what I say,
Sean Doran wrote:
>
> Thomas Narten writes:
>
> | Actually, if your assumption is that NATv6 is better than IPv6 with
> | renumbering, then IPv4 and NATv4 was good enough to start with and
> | there was need to move to IPv6 in the first place.
>^
>no (right? maybe this
Jim,
You make a good point. We have discussed this at length, as
Steve Bellovin described, during the original IPng debate.
Now is the time to deploy, not to discuss. It's hard to find
leadership in a herd of cats, but we have stable standards,
multiple products available or announced, and the IP
To remove yourself from the IETF discussion list, send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enter just the word unsubscribe in the body of the message.
NOTE: List requests do not take effect until the next day, and there
are always messages in the outbound queue. As such, you may
continu
