On Fri, 10 Mar 2000 07:39:53 +0300, Musandu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> This database if created would be a one stop shopping point for "hackers" to
> test their theories because it would most likely be configured to meet the
> standards that are advocated within it (even if the IETF was to ru
Jon Crowcroft:
> see
> http://www-mice.cs.ucl.ac.uk/multimedia/misc/tcp_ip/
> for a slightly incomplete archive of it all
> i couldn't find any other archive but if someone does have
> it, let me know and i'll delete mine and point at theirs...
Hopefully, there will be permanent URLs for those
the best work i know of on TCP behaviour _over_ ATM services is the
thesis (and papers by) Olivier Bonaventure -
http://www.info.fundp.ac.be/~obo/
cheers
jon
In recent years, working groups have come under pressure to define multiple,
parallel data structures for managing various technologies (DHCP, DiffServ,
MPLS, etc.) through different protocols (SNMP, LDAP, COPS, etc.) and network
management paradigms (directories, agents, policy, etc.). A new mail
Hi everyone,
I have errors randomly within two networks interconnected with
fiber-optic.
What procedure should I follow for detecting the problem?
There's any RFC number that describes procedures for seek and solve
network problems?
Thanks a lot!
At 05:57 PM 3/9/00 +0800, Jianbo Huang wrote:
>Dear Sirs and Madams,
>
>A friend of mine are working on the paper on "critically compare the
>congestion control on TCP/IP and ATM", and she ask me for help. But I do
>not get much idea on the "congestion control on ATM". So, is there anyone
>can
ATM ABR offers explicit closed loop feedback about congestion experienced, and
will drop cells/frames if that feedback is not followed. In certain types of VBR
the CLP bit can be used to indicate that a cell was out of profile. Such cells do
not have to be dropped if the network has room for the
> -Original Message-
> From: Fred Baker [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 10, 2000 5:32 AM
> To: Jianbo Huang
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Critically compare the congestion control on TCP/IP
> and ATM?
>
> At 05:57 PM 3/9/00 +0800, Jianbo Huang wrote:
> >D
Dan Grossman writes:
| ATM has a carefully defined traffic management architecture.
Yes, that's its problem.
>From issue 10 of "New Carrier" (http://www.totaltele.com/newcarrier", p 22:
... the past several years' debates over the relative technical
merits of [the] Internet Protocol versus
Matt Holdrege <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The last I heard RC4 was owned by RSA and not exactly open.
RC4 is completely public, though against the will of RSA. It's even
described in Schneier.
> Certainly not. But as someone else mentioned, there are U.S. laws or
> regulations restricting sa
10 matches
Mail list logo
