Date:Fri, 25 Feb 2000 09:38:09 -0500
From:The IESG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| The IESG has received a request from the Domain Name Server Operations
| Working Group to consider Root Name Server Operational Requirements
| as a BCP.
On
>From: "James P. Salsman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: URGENT: W3C web form standards for device input and upload
>
>Thursday evening I spoke with a member of the W3C HTML Working
>Group who removed all my remaining doubt that the HTML WG has any
>serious support for open, non-proprietary web for
Dear Dr. Pemberton,
Thank you for your message. I hope this one gets through. Some
of my email to W3C lists (e.g., www-forms) has not appeared in
the archives.
You state that there are comments regarding how the device upload
proposal can be improved. Please publish them, with my replies t
My heartfelt thanks go out to the great number of IETF participants who
have endorsed the device upload proposal. Sadly, my W3C sources tell me
that there is still insufficient support for the device upload proposal
within the W3C HTML Working Group. The most substantial objection to
device uplo
Vernon Schryver wrote:
> Actually, those who understand the security problem of IP source routes
> knows something else. IP source route options are not problems except to
> broken hosts. It would be nice to think there are no longer such broken
> hosts on the net, but that is too much to expec
"Parkinson, Jonathan" wrote:
> Well he's obviously devoted to this mailing list and hey, perhaps they have
> the same problems with the Internet on the other side !
Well, I actually have that problems. Even working as a ghost, I am
making efforts to contribute to this really large networ
