John C Klensin wrote:
> My, my, do I love being quoted out of context on a comment that
> was made four years ago, and was intended as humorous rather
> than a serious comment on the process.
Sorry, I was not aware that an email to an IETF WG list with
a subject "The appeals process and the IAB
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Given that RFC2267 is over 2 years old now, what *do* you suggest the network
> community at large do to motivate the sites that still haven't
> implemented it?
I think a simple motivation is appearing on the horizon. Lawyers are
revving up their word processors as we
Hello,
I am interested in the following topics:
1) Internet television(all related tech info)
2) High speed Internet fundamentals
3) 801.11 DS cards (11mbps)
If you can refer me to some web files, I would greatly appreciate it.
Thank you for your time and make it a great day.
dan
I think that making egress filtering a BCP, applying community
pressure, bringing law suites, etc., will be about as effective
at eliminating forged source address packets on the Internet as
similar measures have been in eliminating open SMTP relays...
They help, but not much.
Donald
From: Pa
