Re: Patent protection from NATs

2000-04-24 Thread John Stracke
Henning Schulzrinne wrote: > Indeed, I > think we should get together a group of people to patent all the > architecturally bad ideas (call it the "RSI group"), as they'll appear > sooner or later. That will give us 20 years of respite... ...provided somebody pays the legal fees to enforce the p

Re: Patent protection from NATs

2000-04-23 Thread Vernon Schryver
> From: Henning Schulzrinne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To combine the two long-running threads: The solution to the NAT problem > is obvious - we need a submarine patent where somebody claims rights to > NATs and then charges so much for licensing that it makes technically > more sound solutions, say,