Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2560bis-15

2013-03-28 Thread Stefan Santesson
cs.uottawa.ca] >> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 9:57 AM >> To: 'Stefan Santesson'; Black, David; s...@aaa-sec.com; mmy...@fastq.com; >> ambar...@gmail.com; slava.galpe...@gmail.com; gen-...@ietf.org >> Cc: p...@ietf.org; 'Sean Turner'; ietf@ietf.org &

RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2560bis-15

2013-03-28 Thread Black, David
; ambar...@gmail.com; slava.galpe...@gmail.com; gen-...@ietf.org > Cc: p...@ietf.org; 'Sean Turner'; ietf@ietf.org > Subject: RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2560bis-15 > > Hi, > > This wording sounds fine to me. Thanks Stefan! > > Carlisle. > > > -Or

Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2560bis-15

2013-03-28 Thread Stefan Santesson
t;Thanks, >--David > >> -Original Message- >> From: Stefan Santesson [mailto:ste...@aaa-sec.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 11:38 AM >> To: Black, David; s...@aaa-sec.com; mmy...@fastq.com; ambar...@gmail.com; >> slava.galpe...@gmail.com; cad...@eecs.

RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2560bis-15

2013-03-28 Thread Black, David
m; cad...@eecs.uottawa.ca; gen-...@ietf.org > Cc: p...@ietf.org; Sean Turner; ietf@ietf.org > Subject: Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2560bis-15 > > I could. > > My worry is just that this is such a contentious subject and it took us x > hundreds of emails to r

Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2560bis-15

2013-03-28 Thread Stefan Santesson
m: Stefan Santesson [mailto:ste...@aaa-sec.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 7:44 AM >> To: Black, David; s...@aaa-sec.com; mmy...@fastq.com; ambar...@gmail.com; >> slava.galpe...@gmail.com; cad...@eecs.uottawa.ca; gen-...@ietf.org >> Cc: p...@ietf.org; Sean Turner; i

RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2560bis-15

2013-03-27 Thread Black, David
@fastq.com; ambar...@gmail.com; > slava.galpe...@gmail.com; cad...@eecs.uottawa.ca; gen-...@ietf.org > Cc: p...@ietf.org; Sean Turner; ietf@ietf.org > Subject: Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2560bis-15 > > Hi David, > > Yes I missed to respond to that aspect. >

Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2560bis-15

2013-03-27 Thread Stefan Santesson
t;Thanks, >--David > >> -Original Message- >> From: Stefan Santesson [mailto:ste...@aaa-sec.com] >> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 10:21 PM >> To: Black, David; s...@aaa-sec.com; mmy...@fastq.com; ambar...@gmail.com; >> slava.galpe...@gmail.com; cad...@e

RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2560bis-15

2013-03-27 Thread Black, David
013 10:21 PM > To: Black, David; s...@aaa-sec.com; mmy...@fastq.com; ambar...@gmail.com; > slava.galpe...@gmail.com; cad...@eecs.uottawa.ca; gen-...@ietf.org > Cc: p...@ietf.org; Sean Turner; ietf@ietf.org > Subject: Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2560bis-15 > > Hi David,

Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2560bis-15

2013-03-27 Thread Sean Turner
On 3/25/13 10:21 PM, Stefan Santesson wrote: Hi David, Nits: idnits 2.12.15 said: -- The document seems to lack a disclaimer for pre-RFC5378 work, but may have content which was first submitted before 10 November 2008. If you have contacted all the original authors and they are

Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2560bis-15

2013-03-26 Thread Stefan Santesson
Hi David, Thanks for the review. My reply in line. On 3/26/13 1:25 AM, "Black, David" wrote: >Authors, > >I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on >Gen-ART, please >see the FAQ at . > >Please resolve these comm