Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-06

2013-04-25 Thread Ben Campbell
Hi, deleting sections that seem resolved: On Apr 25, 2013, at 8:12 PM, Fernando Gont wrote: [...] > > -- 1, paragraph 11: "This document does not update..." How is adding an alternative algorithm _not_ an update? >>> >>> Well, you still send an RS, receive an RA, and generate

Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-06

2013-04-25 Thread Fernando Gont
Hi, Ben, On 04/25/2013 09:44 PM, Ben Campbell wrote: >>> -- section 3, 2nd paragraph from end: >>> >>> You describe the affects of including Network_ID in some detail. >>> It would be helpful to note the consequences of _not_ including >>> it. >> >> Well, should we really do it? -- after all,

Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-06

2013-04-25 Thread Ben Campbell
On Apr 25, 2013, at 5:32 PM, Fernando Gont wrote: > Hi, Ben, > > Thanks so much for your feedback! Please find my comments in-line... > > On 04/25/2013 03:39 PM, Ben Campbell wrote: >> Minor issues: >> >> -- section 3, third paragraph from end: >> >> The paragraph suggests that changing the

Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-06

2013-04-25 Thread Fernando Gont
Hi, Ben, Thanks so much for your feedback! Please find my comments in-line... On 04/25/2013 03:39 PM, Ben Campbell wrote: > Minor issues: > > -- section 3, third paragraph from end: > > The paragraph suggests that changing the number of network interfaces > should be rare. I think it's quite co