Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01

On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Joel M. Halpern wrote: > I am guessing that the authors intended the addition of the text > emphasizing that the no-zone typedefs are derived general typedef addresses > the difference in the patterns. > > Is there a YANG rule that says tat if typedef X is derived

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01

Thank you Juergen. I see that the pattern statement is therefore correct. And presumably it is a judgment call as to hw to write te new pattern to restrict the old one. Personally, I find a pattern statement that covers a whole lot of other things, but that happens when combined with the pare

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01

Joel, this is specified in the third paragraph of section 9.4.6 of RFC 6020: 9.4.6. The pattern Statement The "pattern" statement, which is an optional substatement to the "type" statement, takes as an argument a regular expression string, as defined in [XSD-TYPES]. It is used to rest

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01

Forwarding to the authors and WG Regards, Benoit I am guessing that the authors intended the addition of the text emphasizing that the no-zone typedefs are derived general typedef addresses the difference in the patterns. Is there a YANG rule that says tat if typedef X is derived from typede

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01

Forwarding to the authors and WG Regards, Benoit I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01

I am guessing that the authors intended the addition of the text emphasizing that the no-zone typedefs are derived general typedef addresses the difference in the patterns. Is there a YANG rule that says tat if typedef X is derived from typedef Y then the string for X must match the pattern fo