I note that neither:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/nomcom/
nor:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/search/?name=nomcom&rfcs=on&sort=
told me that 3777 was also BCP10 now.
(Even if 3777 wasn't BCP10 anymore, I think it would be useful for the
datatracker to tell me that it was part of BCP10, be
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> The place to go is definitely not the page for a closed WG. How can that
> be expected to track things that happened after the WG closed?
> Since it's a BCP, you get the lot at http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/bcp10
> or http://www.rfc-editor.org/bcp/bcp1
On Oct 1, 2013, at 9:29 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> This morning I had reason to re-read parts of RFC3777, and anything
> that updated it. I find the datatracker WG interface to really be
> useful, and so I visited http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/nomcom/
> first. I guess I could have ins
The place to go is definitely not the page for a closed WG. How can that
be expected to track things that happened after the WG closed?
Since it's a BCP, you get the lot at http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/bcp10
or http://www.rfc-editor.org/bcp/bcp10.txt.
In this particular case, you can also find
Not to detract from your point, Michael, but
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/search/?name=nomcom&rfcs=on&sort= is pretty
good.
Adrian
> -Original Message-
> From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Michael Richardson
> Sent: 01 October 2013 19:29
> To: iet
