At 11:26 -0400 29/06/00, Taylor, Johnny wrote:
>Give me some back ground information and how they fit in the communication
>world! Then we can open the discussions!
How they might fit : depending on the definition of "communication world".
As far as I am concerned, toying with audio and video on
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2000 4:52 PM
To: Dan Kohn
Cc: Parkinson, Jonathan; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bluetooth
Dan Kohn wrote:
>
> I will bite regarding one issue near and dear to IETF hearts -- which is
the
> seeming need to buy yet another 802.11 card
Dan Kohn wrote:
>
> I will bite regarding one issue near and dear to IETF hearts -- which is the
> seeming need to buy yet another 802.11 card for each IETF meeting. And yes,
> I am actually suggesting an approach that would require one more purchase:
>
> I was at Bluetooth Congress in Europe
Give me some back ground information and how they fit in the communication
world! Then we can open the discussions!
-Original Message-
From: Parkinson, Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2000 10:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bluetooth
Hi folks
I will bite regarding one issue near and dear to IETF hearts -- which is the
seeming need to buy yet another 802.11 card for each IETF meeting. And yes,
I am actually suggesting an approach that would require one more purchase:
I was at Bluetooth Congress in Europe this month (which sounds bette
> I will bite regarding one issue near and dear to IETF hearts -- which is the
> seeming need to buy yet another 802.11 card for each IETF meeting.
btw, those daze are over, at least for the moment.
from the current version of draft-ymbk-termroom-op-03.txt,
2.5 Wireless LAN
...
t the frequency it runs on.
-Original Message-
From: Dan Kohn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2000 9:54 AM
To: Parkinson, Jonathan; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Bluetooth
I will bite regarding one issue near and dear to IETF hearts -- which is
the
seeming need to bu
to me, the most salient difference between bluetooth and 802.11 is the
addressing. with a three bit address, i see bluetooth as a viable
competitor for infrared ports.
randy
> no. but a email thread on
> bluetooth is just scsi without copper
> might be interesting:-)
but don't newer scsi busses have a larger address space?
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Parkinson, Jonathan" typed:
>> Anyone care to start a discussion about Bluetooth and how it
>>may/will impact the future of communications ? And the new generation of
>>Virus's that could come along with this technology.
no. but a email thread on
blueto
10 matches
Mail list logo
