Re: Fwd: [dnsext] SPF isn't going to change, was Deprecating SPF

2013-08-23 Thread John Levine
>>> Nobody has argued that SPF usage is zero, and the reasons for >>> deprecating SPF have been described repeatedly here and on the ietf >>> list, so this exercise seems fairly pointless. >> >> the reasons for not deprecating SPF have been described here >> and on the ietf list repeated

Fwd: [dnsext] SPF isn't going to change, was Deprecating SPF

2013-08-23 Thread manning bill
Begin forwarded message: > Resent-From: bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com > From: bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com > Subject: Re: [dnsext] SPF isn't going to change, was Deprecating SPF > Date: August 23, 2013 10:03:26 PDT > Resent-To: bmann...@isi.edu > To: John Levine > Cc: dns...@ietf.org > > On F