On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:19 PM, Yaron Sheffer wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> I am quite sure that I fully understand the semantics of "critical"
> (probably erroneously), so I'm not the right person to clarify the various
> meanings of the word. I would appreciate a proposal.
>
> Just for the record, my "
In fact I answered your question precisely when I mentioned "contained"
data items (i.e., contained in the critical one). So I may be wrong but
at least I'm consistent...
I think the concept of criticality is powerful, even if in the past we
messed it up.
Thanks,
Yaron
On 2013-08-15
On Aug 15, 2013, at 1:19 PM, Yaron Sheffer wrote:
> I am quite sure that I fully understand the semantics of "critical" (probably
> erroneously), so I'm not the right person to clarify the various meanings of
> the word. I would appreciate a proposal.
>
> Just for the record, my "critical" mea
Hi Paul,
I am quite sure that I fully understand the semantics of "critical"
(probably erroneously), so I'm not the right person to clarify the
various meanings of the word. I would appreciate a proposal.
Just for the record, my "critical" means: the reader must be able to
process the data i
On Aug 15, 2013, at 12:26 PM, Yaron Sheffer wrote:
>>> - One tag value you may want to consider adding is "critical" in the
>>> security sense of the word, i.e., an application is required to fail if
>>> it does not understand the value (probably best applied to map keys).
>>
>> That's also an i
