Re: [icinga-users] Icinga2 agent communication questions

2015-09-25 Thread Michael Friedrich
> On 24 Sep 2015, at 23:24, Eric Zounes wrote: > > So I just discovered the problem I was having. It won't relay checks back to > the parent node correctly because the A record pointing at the static NAT > address is different than the one pointing at the internal address. I'll file > a bug re

Re: [icinga-users] Icinga2 agent communication questions

2015-09-25 Thread Michael Friedrich
> On 25 Sep 2015, at 09:46, Michael Friedrich > wrote: > >> >> On 24 Sep 2015, at 23:24, Eric Zounes wrote: >> >> So I just discovered the problem I was having. It won't relay checks back to >> the parent node correctly because the A record pointing at the static NAT >> address is different t

Re: [icinga-users] Icingaweb2 Setting Downtime or Acknowledgement

2015-09-25 Thread Romaneev Vasily
Hello! Thank you for your responce. I enable command feature. url is http://localhost/icinga2/dashboard#!/icinga2/monitoring/service/acknowledge-problem?host=custompartsdeport.co&service=check_snmp_storage Could you help - what additional info i can set or what else i should check, thank you! M

[icinga-users] False status displayed for a service on Icingaweb2

2015-09-25 Thread Bertalan Voros
Hello All, For some reason an alert keeps flipping between critical then normal for the apt service for a single host. It was a valid alert in the morning, all packages were updated and it should now be OK. Just like it is now on all other monitored hosts. Already tried removing the host and rea

[icinga-users] Cluster configuration - Host checks in Pending state

2015-09-25 Thread Nicolas Odermatt
Hi guys, Today I setup an icinga cluster consisting of one master and one satellite according to the guide in the official documentation [0]. I got through the steps alright and both nodes are up and running but I've got a problem with the configuration of the zones. I've got the host files for b

Re: [icinga-users] icinga-users Digest, Vol 21, Issue 42

2015-09-25 Thread George, Jude
Just a follow-up to this earlier question I had posed. My prior solution was incorrect. I have discovered a way in SQL to ignore subsequent HARD recoveries into an "OK" state that follow any SOFT non-OK states. The PostgreSQL query (on the icinga_statehistory table) is as follows: state_type ==