Re: [icinga-users] submitting passive check results in 1.11 not working

2014-03-28 Thread Ferenc Stelcz
Hi! I neither use SELinux nor AppArmor. STrace output (pasting the relevant lines only): # strace -p `pidof nsca` -o /tmp/nsca.trc ... sendto(3, "<27>Mar 28 13:07:16 nsca[29721]:"..., 94, MSG_NOSIGNAL, NULL, 0) = 94 sendto(3, "<29>Mar 28 13:07:16 nsca[29721]:"..., 176, MSG_NOSIGNAL, NULL, 0) =

Re: [icinga-users] submitting passive check results in 1.11 not working

2014-03-27 Thread Brian O'Neill
First thought is that you might have something like SELinux or apparmor (not sure what SLES uses) that needs to allow permission beyond the file permissions. On 3/27/2014 9:22 AM, Ferenc Stelcz wrote: Hi! I've just upgraded my DRBD backed 2 node Icinga pacemaker cluster on SLES11SP3 to the m

Re: [icinga-users] submitting passive check results in 1.11 not working

2014-03-27 Thread Michael Friedrich
strace the daemons. Am 27.03.2014 14:22 schrieb "Ferenc Stelcz" : > Hi! > > I've just upgraded my DRBD backed 2 node Icinga pacemaker cluster on > SLES11SP3 to the most recent Icinga version. > > I have a third node which is (was... :P) sending passive service check > results from a remote site. A

[icinga-users] submitting passive check results in 1.11 not working

2014-03-27 Thread Ferenc Stelcz
Hi! I've just upgraded my DRBD backed 2 node Icinga pacemaker cluster on SLES11SP3 to the most recent Icinga version. I have a third node which is (was... :P) sending passive service check results from a remote site. After the upgrade I get the following in /var/log/messages: Mar 27 14:11:21 ici