Re: [icinga-users] Stopping notifications on services when their host goes down

2015-10-22 Thread Horatiu N
This is probably what's happening. will test and come back with a reply. On 22-Oct-15 1:35 AM, Brian O'Neill wrote: > Are the services going into a HARD state before the host is? Depending > on the values of check_interval, retry_interval and max_check_attempts > for the host and the services, it

Re: [icinga-users] Stopping notifications on services when their host goes down

2015-10-21 Thread Brian O'Neill
Are the services going into a HARD state before the host is? Depending on the values of check_interval, retry_interval and max_check_attempts for the host and the services, it is possible that the services are entering a hard state before the host does. Once the host hits a hard state, the serv

Re: [icinga-users] Stopping notifications on services when their host goes down

2015-10-21 Thread Chris Heerschap
I have observed the same, and have wondered the same thing. One theory I've had is if the services go hard critical before the host does, the dependencies might not be applied. I haven't done anything to test this theory, however. cmh On Oct 21, 2015 4:51 PM, "Horatiu N" wrote: > Hello, > > In

[icinga-users] Stopping notifications on services when their host goes down

2015-10-21 Thread Horatiu N
Hello, In the docs it sais that all services belonging to a host are automatically linked (dependencies applied) so that when the host is down the notification doesnt apply to them and only one notification is sent regarding the host being down, which makes sense since some hosts can have loads of