Damnit, meant to add
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 1:21 PM, zMan wrote:
> Speaking of not talking like a mainframer...
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 11:42 AM, John Gilmore wrote:
>
>> Some part of David Crayford's problem here is that he does not talk
>> like---and a
Phew, sorry, I missed that you were being sarcastic too. I really should
have checked -- I remember thinking "Wow, I didn't expect that from HIM!"
-- which should have been a clue!
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 10:03 PM, David Crayford wrote:
> I was being sarcastic Timothy! I thought that was obvious
> amount of this storage available gradually diminishes, leaks away, until
> processing can no longer continue or performance deteriorates
> spectacularly.
>
> Here, I think, some loss in precision would attend using a generic term
> like
> 'storage error&#
Well then...they just don't know how to use the tools they have. Lovely.
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 9:58 PM, David Crayford wrote:
> On 11/10/2013 5:47 AM, Charles Mills wrote:
>
>> FWIW, MS Visual Studio 2010, which I use for editing and alpha testing,
>> has
>> excellent memory leak diagnosis fac
Very SHORT secrets!!!
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Clark Morris wrote:
> On 14 Oct 2013 08:16:31 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>
> >A few people might even still have a long, wide strip from a 2321 data
> cell.
> >
> I think I still have one complete with possible atomic energy
gt;> much blame for those taking on those tasks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Adam
>>>>>
>>>>> Good question. For professional training (which costs $$), it is
>>>>>>
>>>>> likely
>>>>>
>>>>
ubscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
--
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it"
--
For IBM-MA
irst?
> -
> Ted MacNEIL
> eamacn...@yahoo.ca
> Twitter: @TedMacNEIL
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-
"Manual assistance"?!? didn't we invent computers, big data
> and what not to save menial work.
> :)
>
> ZA
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructio
ed gy HSM and similar products, that advantage
> is shrinking. I'm accustomed to seeing messages on Solaris
> analogous to the HSM recall messages I see on TSO.
>
> -- gil
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subsc
swered and thought about in the aforementioned algorithm. I do not want
> people to shoot the idea down just because I referred to only one example.
> I begin to have fun in toying this ides!
>
> ZA
>
> ----
--
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
--
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid t
d "WTF?" - wrong list. Hey,
> it's Wednesday.
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
--
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not a
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
--
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it"
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
that!
--
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it"
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
E1DC CL46'FIRSTONE'
> SPAC1DC CL12''
> DC CL2' '
> GRP1 DC CL8' '
> MEM DC CL75' '
> DATECDS 0CL8
> YR DS CL4
> MO DS CL2
> DY DS CL2
> END
>
nd BookManager to Linux or OS/2.
>
>
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
--
zMan
in key 8??
? (Pretend that was a monospace font if it isn't in your client!)
--
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it"
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instruct
t to be squeezed out of what you
> are doing now.
>
> John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu
, the IPK approach looks a
bit better.
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Binyamin Dissen <
bdis...@dissensoftware.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Dec 2013 18:31:17 -0500 zMan wrote:
>
> :>Is there a simpler way to see whether we were called in key 8 (not that
> :>this is that compli
lly count on the filtering by the client side - if it
> will
> be setting a client passed protected storage location or accessing
> something
> that the client could not directly access it will need to validate the
> callers
> key itself.
>
> On Sat, 28 Dec 2013 15:35:33 -0500 zM
> that loaded microcode from main storage. X'B9', iirc. Used by OLTEP
> tests, I think.
>
> Tony H.
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to list
---
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
--
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it"
--
such places.
>
> Ed
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
> to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
>
-
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
--
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it"
---
Here's the BBCs take on a day without data sharing:
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-29802368
>
> Shane ...
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@list
Ah, thanks. Was just comparing the main topic. You get extra credit for the
insight...
On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Shane Ginnane wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Oct 2014 12:09:56 -0400, zMan wrote:
>
> >So, not trying to pick a fight, just confused: What does your reply have
> to
>
r
>
>
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
--
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I&#x
this message in your possession, custody or control.
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
--
zMan -- "
iał Gospodarczy Krajowego
> Rejestru Sądowego, nr rejestru przedsiębiorców KRS 025237, NIP:
> 526-021-50-88. Według stanu na dzień 01.01.2015 r. kapitał zakładowy mBanku
> S.A. (w całości wpłacony) wynosi 168.840.228 złotych.
>
>
> -
> touts that
> as a merit of PL/I.
>
> -- gil
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
/ archive access instructions,
> > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@list
, including folks having to requisition
rubber bands and having them shipped from HQ *in lots of 10*.
Given that Art's wife was apparently equally loony and was CFO, I guess the
bankruptcy isn't a surprise. The good news:
http://www.asg.com/Company/Executive-Management.aspx no longer shows
gt; company. It was truly weird.
>
>
>
>
> Mitch
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: zMan
> To: IBM-MAIN
> Sent: Sat, Mar 7, 2015 8:11 pm
> Subject: Re: bloomberg article on ASG and Chpater 11
>
>
> A friend used to work at ASG, is out
he message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>
>>
> I'm thinking Yahoo has it right
>
> Regards,
> Tom Conley
>
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>
iller said:
>
> >It wasn't always blinking lights that the public and Hollywood equated
> >to computers. I think that of the movies I have seen, most of them
> >focused (pun not intended) on spinning reel-to-reel tape drives.
>
> ---
SA
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
--
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not
M, which means a physically secure, tamper-detecteing device
>> like the Crypto Express. This is what the auditors are measuring the
>> systems against.
>>
>> Todd Arnold
>>
>
> --**--**--
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
--
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it"
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
uch person replace the entire z with a
> counterfeit look-alike ...
>
> -- gil
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu
e Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of zMan
> Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2013 9:56 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Crypto Facility performance.
>
> zSeries doesn't support Protected Key. Oh, wait,you probably *really*
> meant System z.
-
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
--
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it"
---
IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instruc
o they're quite surprised
that as z folks, we expect an API to be callable from pretty well any
language (modulo pathologies like COBOL's inability to do dynamic memory
allocation).
--
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it"
--
;
> John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
--
acter arrays and an explicit length. C programmers are quite used
> to this, viz. memcpy() etc.
>
> Charles
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of zMan
> Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 12:53
tring works in C++ where you can call c_str() to return a
> null terminated string.
>
> On 29/06/2013, at 9:15 AM, zMan wrote:
>
> > Right, but these kids don't seem to be. The argument I'm getting is "OK,
> > but even if we pass an explicit length, peopl
INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Unless stated otherwise above:
> > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> > 741598.
> > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Ha
IN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
--
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it"
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
---
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
--
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it"
---
@TedMacNEIL
>
> -Original Message-
> From: zMan
> Sender: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2013 16:30:43
> To:
> Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> Subject: Re: Question on how to debug S0C7 (data exception) abend
>
>
' labor market.
>
> Careful fella, I resemble that.
> Timothys platitudes notwithstandng, the market here is a shot duck.
>
> Shane ...
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
ructions,
>> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>
>
> --**--**--
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
--
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it"
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
> > --
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive acc
ive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
--
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it"
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
n Monday and find the system reporting the time as 0130 on
> Sunday. (If the coding is correctly designed, there is no such thing as
> a semiannual "time change".)
>
Windows 95 did that, IIRC...
--
zMan -- "I've got
cated to 80 characters. Someday I'll get in a PMR
> mood. Data integrity, as I see it.
>
> -- gil
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@li
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Lindy Mayfield wrote:
> Granted a punch card in no matter what language would most likely be 80
> bytes long.
Before someone else points it out: unless it's a 96-column S/3 card, or a
90-column Remington-Rand card :-)
--
zMan -- "I've go
price increase was bad.
>
>
> http://paritynews.com/business/item/502-microsoft-goes-after-enterprise-customers-raises-licensing-prices
--
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it"
ant "legal code", then are you saying that Polish law requires
portability? If so, would that we had such consumer-protective laws here!
--
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it"
---
ow customers
> rigths. Would it be posible to demand from customer to wear a tie + red
> shoes when using the software ?
OK, but since they control the activation, I'm not sure how the EULA comes
into play...
--
zMan
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 1:33 PM, R.S. wrote:
> BTW: the thread is becoming off-topic. This groups is about mainframes.
>
True, my bad. Thanks.
--
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it"
-
Much better Subject: than, "How did I wind up loaded?" :-)
--
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it"
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send ema
rtunately maybe better since my only language is United States
> English - no snide comments from the Commonwealth please).
Indeed. This wasn't a case of poor English -- it was a case of English
being poor. What he wrote was grammatical and clear, just ambiguous, due to
English lack of
And...there we go again.
--
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it"
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
And here I was, laughing about it; everyone take a chill pill.
--
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it"
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
Heh, I read that as "a PATENT queuing theory". Meta-patent!
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Ed Gould wrote:
> John:
>
> The number is sort of misleading. IBM seems to patent *EVERYTHING* even a
> patient queing theory.
> We have talked about this before on here.
ast August.
>
I realize it's not your article AND it's the Inquirer, but: how is IBM
"slowly lifting the veil" on something that was announced four months ago,
with lots of detail then? I'm confused.
--
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to
whine occasionally about being unable to find work. There
couldn't possibly be a connection between their behavior and that problem,
of course...
--
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it"
-
---
> >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> >send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
where they could be logged on. In those days, no remote
> access. Inside, id verified, escorted, watched, etc.
--
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it"
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signof
et locked out and have to
wait for a reset!"
--
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it"
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
ee (but would never
commit) vandalism against that neighbor you hate: at least there you get to
see him be unhappy and deal with it. But messing with someone half a world
away that you'll never meet just seems pointless.
Better you should take that energy and write some USEFUL code, eh?
--
zMan -- &q
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Scott Ford wrote:
> John,
>
> Agree totally, but we need to convince the powers to be that hackers must
> be licensed and monitored
Hm. That's a stretch; I'm not particularly Libertarian/anti-regulation, but
this seems impractical.
-
locksmith <> someone with lock picks and the skills to use
them. The latter aren't *illegal*, except in environments where they might
be used for ill. Same with hacking skillz...
--
zMan -- "I've got a mainfram
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Scott Ford wrote:
> zMan, I know but can one stop the people who hack and create viruses ,
> they are so destructive
I don't see how.
ObAnecdote (not directly related, but fun): a friend has lock picking
skills (and picks). He swears the follow
are.confex.com/share/118/webprogram/Session11089.html. The
> handouts are linked on the page.
Well, you'd *filter* those, eh?
--
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it"
--
For IBM-MAIN s
computers do better than people,
> it
> is comparing two large numbers for equality ...
Wow. That stories a keeper!
Yeah, SMF might be better, but that wasn't the OP's question -- I just
always resist telling someo
owerful than a 3090...certainly has more
memory!
--
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it"
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
MA575752
> Trademarks: z/VSE, Registered, 1198808, TMA677185
>
> Of course there are doubtless many subtleties involved in trademarks
> and trademark searches that I am unfamiliar with, so I will have
> missed all sorts of things and their s
never used it. Since those were *very* different
industries (OK, both have cables, but), that was clearly an OK confluence
of names. Smartphones...not so clear!
--
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it"
---
eaningful than
just going to 2.9.14. I don't, but that's me.
--
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it"
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
mers to modify.
--
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it"
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
user: http://xkcd.com/1171/
--
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it"
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 10:01 AM, David Andrews wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 09:29 -0500, zMan wrote:
> > Does the enhanced symbol support mean that you can use symbols in places
> > like this:
> > REPRO INFILE(GIMZPOOL) +
> > OUTDATASET
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Grinsell, Don wrote:
> The issue must be 64-bit vs 32-bit.
Who'd'a THUNK it! (Sorry, couldn't resist...)
--
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it"
-
servers; even just with mergers
etc., those would be a lot smaller.
My SWAG is 3K for each nowadays, plus ~100 TPF; essentially no additional
Linux for System z, since the real shops running Linux on z are also
running z/VM.
--
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'
nable what I need...)
Admittedly, COBOL isn't as bad as I'd been led to believe by three decades
of avoiding it -- but as the saying goes, "You can write your program in
, or you can write a story about your progra
Can you do that for fields in an existing copybook?
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 11:36 AM, David Andrews wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-02-16 at 16:14 -0500, zMan wrote:
> > If this was supposed to be asking "What is it that's awkward to do in
> > COBOL?", try calculating the of
;m willing to believe that. I certainly don't claim to be a COBOL
jock, nor is my most common source for COBOL help. So I should probably
just shut up (hey, stop cheering!).
--
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it"
-
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 5:09 PM, CM Poncelet wrote:
> No, you didn't. The UK built the first electronic computer in 1942,
> Colossus I.
>
One computer doth not an industry make, alas.
--
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and
0-line module and
say "Here, try this..."
Sheesh. That sounds like the IBM of old, when they'd do anything to avoid
fixing bugs (I remember once saying "'ALL' means 'ALL', damnit!" to a Level
2 rep, who was arguing that the documentation didn't mean
dumb: what's a "squirrel event"? Sounds like something
Macy's would advertise...
--
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it"
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archiv
the reserved byte
instead, we'd only have needed one format! (Well, until there's 64-bit I/O,
anyway).
--
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it"
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
HIS way",
but I don't understand how a script is different from "one command"?
--
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it"
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
gt; wires, I suspect!!!
>
Done by Mexican peasants, paid pennies...but yeah. I suspect shipping it
may have cost more than making it at the time.
--
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it"
but found over 270 ambiguous
> definitions...
> >
> > Groete / Greetings
> > Elardus Engelbrecht
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
--
zMan -
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Tom Marchant wrote:
> Nothing has yet been announced, so if anyone has heard,
> they are likely unable to say.
>
My money's on zB1296CDEF, given the crack the System z marketroids seem to
be smoking lately...
--
zMan -- "I've got a main
nce on the contents of the E-mail or attached files is
> strictly prohibited.
>
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO
---
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
--
zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it"
--
Uh oh, new GMail "Reply" format will irritate the bottom-posters -- now
it's non-trivial to not top-post. Let the flamewars resume.
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 10:56 AM, zMan wrote:
> And this is new how? :-)
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 10:16 AM, John Gilmore
401 - 500 of 568 matches
Mail list logo
