Re: HashiCorp Vault and Nomad for IBM Z/LinuxONE

2025-03-26 Thread Timothy Sipples
In my original post to open this thread I included a private Web link to a blog post. Here’s the correct public link that should be working now: https://www.ibm.com/new/announcements/ibm-vault-self-managed-for-z-and-linuxone-and-ibm-nomad-self-managed-for-z-and-linuxone-generally-available —

Debunking lies about mainframe skills Was: Fededral Project

2025-03-26 Thread Jon Perryman
>>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On >>Behalf Of Jousma, David >>“news” still uses the codeword of 30-year old technology to mean the >>mainframe systems there, and the code they run. > On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 13:48:30 -0500, Steve Beaver > wrote: >The ISSUERS

Re: Java saved IBM Z?!

2025-03-26 Thread Mike Shaw
+1 Ed. I was at the Poughkeepsie TDM where Don Ault gave ISVs the initial presentation on Open MVS. That was way before Linux was ported to the mainframe. At the time, I didn't understand the need for OMVS, but it has turned out to be a lifesaving element that has kept our ecosystem afloat. Mike

Re: Java saved IBM Z?!

2025-03-26 Thread Phil Smith III
Ok, mayyybe. Though I'd point out that the existence of USS may have made (probably did make) those other things easier to implement, but that doesn't mean they were impossible without it. And your response doesn't really address my question, I don't think? -Original Message- From: IBM

Re: Java saved IBM Z?!

2025-03-26 Thread Martin Packer
Not to disagree but a filesystem would’ve been necessary – beyond 8-character qualifiers and 44 characters overall. Cheers, Martin From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Phil Smith III Date: Wednesday, 26 March 2025 at 16:22 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Java

Re: Java saved IBM Z?!

2025-03-26 Thread Ed Jaffe
On 3/26/2025 7:38 AM, Phil Smith III wrote: https://www.quora.com/What-are-some-notable-failed-programming-tools-that-promised-to-revolutionize-software-development Trausti Thor Johannsson's response (which is currently at the top there, but might not be later) includes "[Java] not only made Ma

Re: Java saved IBM Z?!

2025-03-26 Thread Phil Smith III
Good point. Still we aren't answering the original question... -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Martin Packer Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2025 12:49 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Java saved IBM Z?! Not to disagree but a filesystem would'v

REXX for LOGSTREAM Define

2025-03-26 Thread Steely.Mark
I had ChatGPT attempt this, but the generated code failed. Since I am not highly skilled in REXX, I struggled to troubleshoot and fix the issues. Would anyone have a working solution that can read the DATA TYPE(LOGR) REPORT(YES) output from the IXCMIAPU utility and generate the appropriate DEFINE

Re: Office 365

2025-03-26 Thread Mike Schwab
Office 365 uses content as data for Artificial Intelligence. Your content may appear on someone else's screen. HIPAA, Legal Documents, Trade Secrets, etc should not be touched by Office 365. You will lose all content if you stop paying. On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 1:52 PM Steve Beaver < 050e0c375

Re: Expand DSN names (WAS : Java saved IBM Z?!)

2025-03-26 Thread Farley, Peter
Well, ECKD wasn’t a mistake when DASD arm movement and rotation speed were MUCH slower and bit density so much lower than today’s devices. Minimizing arm movement back then gave us dramatically positive application speed improvements. I never did understand the IBM politics that provided native

Re: Expand DSN names (WAS : Java saved IBM Z?!)

2025-03-26 Thread Pew, Curtis G
On Mar 26, 2025, at 5:12 PM, Farley, Peter <031df298a9da-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: Well, ECKD wasn’t a mistake when DASD arm movement and rotation speed were MUCH slower and bit density so much lower than today’s devices. Minimizing arm movement back then gave us dramatically p

Re: Expand DSN names (WAS : Java saved IBM Z?!)

2025-03-26 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 21:25:01 +, Pew, Curtis G wrote: >... >Things that can already exploit zFS would have no trouble exploiting this. >Also, programs that use QSAM or BSAM can in many cases run just fine using >Unix files instead of MVS datasets. IBM should make that even easier, and >pr

Re: Office 365

2025-03-26 Thread Farley, Peter
The Office 365 yearly subscription is IMHO the best bang for the buck. They allow at least 5 devices (might have been upped to 10, I don't remember now, but my family only uses 4) with a terabyte of online cloud (OneDrive) storage for each user. Peter From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On

Expand DSN names (WAS : Java saved IBM Z?!)

2025-03-26 Thread Steve Thompson
I agree that the 8 char node and 44 char limit on DSN names needs to be expanded. That is going to hit VTOCs and CATALOGs and JCL, and dynamic allocation But there is always z/OS 4.1 (kinda would match with OE,  h). Steve Thompson On 3/26/2025 12:48 PM, Martin Packer wrote: Not to d

Re: Java saved IBM Z?!

2025-03-26 Thread Seymour J Metz
While I will admit to being an MVS bigot, it is only fair to mention that IBM also implemented OpenEdition VM; as with MVS, IBM later renamed it. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר _

Re: Expand DSN names (WAS : Java saved IBM Z?!)

2025-03-26 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 20:24:19 +, Pew, Curtis G wrote: > >But there is always z/OS 4.1 (kinda would match with OE, h). > > >Rather than this, I’d suggest I M implement a z/OS native filesystem that >lives on a raw FBA storage device. Path names already have the additional >length and char

Re: Office 365

2025-03-26 Thread Tony Harminc
On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 at 14:52, Steve Beaver < 050e0c375a14-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > I am going to have to bite the bullet and Upgrade from MS Office 2010 to > > Office 365 mostly for Outlook on 2 PC, My Desktop and a Laptop. I have my > own Domain. > Any suggestions ? IMHO the

Re: Expand DSN names (WAS : Java saved IBM Z?!)

2025-03-26 Thread Seymour J Metz
Sigma? You don't have to go as far as SDS; IBM had that too, in TSS. --  Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Paul Gilmartin Sent: Wed

Re: Expand DSN names (WAS : Java saved IBM Z?!)

2025-03-26 Thread Seymour J Metz
More fundamentally, why the MVS designers didn't steal VAM from TSS, including VIPAM, and why the didn't steal the idea of a Reverse Compatibility Interface (RCI) allowing ACB access to PS and PO. --  Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥

Re: Debunking lies about mainframe skills Was: Fededral Project

2025-03-26 Thread Steve Thompson
I would love to get a few Doge people into a room, people who are supposedly knowledgeable about computer architecture. And be able to have about 5 minutes of their time. Some years ago I drew on a serviette in a cafeteria some years two conceptual diagrams for two computer types being used at

Re: Office 365

2025-03-26 Thread Matthew Stitt
I bought a copy of OFFICE 2016 and upgraded from OFFICE 2007. Just have to get used to the new look and ways of doing things. Looking at OFFICE 2021. You must want to share things across all your machines. Matthew On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 15:19:46 -0400, Steve Thompson wrote: >I use Thunderbird.

Re: Expand DSN names (WAS : Java saved IBM Z?!)

2025-03-26 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 15:51:43 -0400, Steve Thompson wrote: >I agree that the 8 char node and 44 char limit on DSN names needs >to be expanded. That is going to hit VTOCs and CATALOGs and JCL, >and dynamic allocation > Are you one of those radicals who think that sooner or later you'll need more

Re: Expand DSN names (WAS : Java saved IBM Z?!)

2025-03-26 Thread Pew, Curtis G
On Mar 26, 2025, at 2:51 PM, Steve Thompson wrote: I agree that the 8 char node and 44 char limit on DSN names needs to be expanded. That is going to hit VTOCs and CATALOGs and JCL, and dynamic allocation But there is always z/OS 4.1 (kinda would match with OE, h). Rather than this,

Re: Office 365

2025-03-26 Thread Joel Ewing
The first queston to ask yourself is:  Do you really need features that are unique to Outlook?. There are some very good email client alternatives to Outlook, some completely free (e.g.,Thunderbird). I have always preferred the desktop-only versions of Office to the forced integration with MS

Re: Office 365

2025-03-26 Thread Steve Thompson
I use Thunderbird.  I once used Evolution but ran into oddities. Don't know if it is even supported anymore. On 3/26/2025 2:51 PM, Steve Beaver wrote: I am going to have to bite the bullet and Upgrade from MS Office 2010 to Office 365 mostly for Outlook on 2 PC, My Desktop and a Laptop. I hav

Re: Expand DSN names (WAS : Java saved IBM Z?!)

2025-03-26 Thread Mike Schwab
Well, keys can be 255 bytes. Or keep VTOC key length of 44 and store longer name in another catalog field, Short name consists of LLQ and as many HLQs (30+ bytes) as will fit and an 4 byte (a-z)(a-z0-9) unique qualifier in between. //ddname DD DISP=SHR,DNS(x?)=(data,set, name), etc On Wed

Re: Office 365

2025-03-26 Thread Seymour J Metz
Have you considered OpenOffice or LibreOffice? --  Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Steve Beaver Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2025 2

Re: Expand DSN names (WAS : Java saved IBM Z?!)

2025-03-26 Thread Pew, Curtis G
On Mar 26, 2025, at 3:53 PM, Paul Gilmartin <042bfe9c879d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: (Am I missing whimsical intent?) What programs, utilities, facilities would you expect to exploit such a filesystem? Doesn't zFS already emulate a raw FBA storage device? Embed a z/OS native fil

z/OS Container Extensions 2.0: No Additional Charge

2025-03-26 Thread Timothy Sipples
I’m a rather surprised nobody seems to have mentioned this important expansion in the base z/OS operating system yet, so I’ll mention it! (Did I just miss it?) https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/announcements/withdrawal-from-marketing-container-hosting-foundation-zos-replacements-available?region=US He

Re: RACF vs ISPF and controlled environment

2025-03-26 Thread Robert S. Hansel
Sean, I do not believe that restricting the use of a program to specific LPARs using a conditional permission of WHEN(SYSID(smf-id)) requires a clean program environment. A clean environment would be needed if you are trying to use a conditional permission of WHEN(PROGRAM(program)) for dataset

Re: z/OS Container Extensions 2.0: No Additional Charge

2025-03-26 Thread Jousma, David
Yes, we are aware! Saves a bit of $$$ for us. We are currently running a half dozen zCX instances running Rocket Terminal Emulator Web, JSPWiki, IBM Workload Scheduler Console, and will move Omegamon TEP and TEMS(when available), plus whatever else comes along. We are fairly silo’d here base

Re: Curiosity question on batch job management

2025-03-26 Thread Jerry Whitteridge
We use Trident Services product OS/Em to do exactly that - We can limit a user to a max number of concurrent jobs independent of job name. I suspect that its probably a big hammer to bring in a product to do just that one function, but you'd get many additional benefits from using OS/EM Jerry W

Office 365

2025-03-26 Thread Steve Beaver
I am going to have to bite the bullet and Upgrade from MS Office 2010 to Office 365 mostly for Outlook on 2 PC, My Desktop and a Laptop. I have my own Domain. Any suggestions ? TIA -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /