Re: CBU upgrade

2024-08-12 Thread Jim Elliott
What you need to do is order a MES to extend the current CBU record, not create a new one. As long as the current CBU term has not expired, it can be extended and the installation of this is non-disruptive. Talk to your BP z tech or IBM z tech and they can explain this in more detail. -

Re: Multiple VIPAs

2024-08-12 Thread John S. Giltner, Jr.
You should only need to add a new VIPA: For all traffic that is initiated to your system, they just specify the destination IP address 7.7.7.8, or create a DNS entry that resolves to that address and have them use that host name. For most of traffic the that you initiate outbound I would look

Re: Multiple VIPAs

2024-08-12 Thread roscoe5
John, Thanks for your time and the thorough response. I’m not too concerned about the applications, but your comments confirmed what I thought in that area. One quick test failed to work in the OSPF space (did not recognize the new IP address). However, I think I’ll have another test opportunity

Re: Multiple VIPAs

2024-08-12 Thread John S. Giltner, Jr.
O.K., that is a routing issue. You need to look at your OSPF parameters and verify that you are setup to advertise 7.7.7.8 to your neighbors. If your not, then you need to update you OSPF parameters to advertise it and go from there. No matter what you may want to check with whomever handles

Re: CBU upgrade

2024-08-12 Thread Peter
Hello Jim Under HMC - Perform model conversion I don't see extension options On Mon, 12 Aug 2024, 14:52 Jim Elliott, < 060a87997a77-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > What you need to do is order a MES to extend the current CBU record, not > create a new one. As long as the current CBU

Re: Multiple VIPAs

2024-08-12 Thread roscoe5
Thanks again. I understand it’s a routing issue and I added a matching OSPF_Interface where the original one was defined, using the new IP and Destination Address. But when I issue the OBEYFILE command I get “EZZ7871I NO MATCHING INTERFACE STATEMENTS FOR 7.7.7.8 (VIPALINK2)”. My gut instinct keep

Re: CBU upgrade

2024-08-12 Thread P H
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/sites/default/files/inline-files/SC28-6846-02c.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwios-OKzu-HAxV2U0EAHSGuIzUQFnoECEAQAQ&usg=AOvVaw35iaouKAIpO7mNt4jiwcD2 https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url

Re: Multiple VIPAs

2024-08-12 Thread Wolfgang Fritz
HI I use only one static Vipa / lpar but we have some dynamic VIPAS for each application (FTP, CICS, DB2 and so on..) it works fine. regards Wolfgang Am 12.08.2024 um 15:51 schrieb roscoe5: Thanks again. I understand it’s a routing issue and I added a matching OSPF_Interface where the

Re: Couple of questions about job id

2024-08-12 Thread Dave Barry
For a given ASID, look at OUCB +B0. JES2, STC or TSO should appear. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Seymour J Metz Sent: Thursday, August 8, 2024 9:20 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Couple of questions about job id CAUTION! T

Re: Multiple VIPAs

2024-08-12 Thread roscoe5
My main problem was, I tried to use an OBEYFILE command to refresh OMPROUTE. I believe I should be using a MODIFY. F OMPROUTE,RECONFIG I’m not yet 100% there, but past my original questions. Thanks for your help Sent from [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/mail/home) for iOS On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 a

Re: Resource manager for subsystem

2024-08-12 Thread Scott Ballentine
Hi all, I'll share a number of thoughts on this thread, in no particular order > I have found this thread interesting, and what I believe is needed > is a SSI ROLLBACK or UNDO function. So that in the ESTAE/ESTAEX routine > or in the init routine itself the "system" would remove any changes m

Re: Resource manager for subsystem

2024-08-12 Thread Michael Stein
> > Change the subsystem name in the SSCT (perhaps change one character to lower > > case) and free everything. Of course, be careful that nothing is running in > > the code dynamically loaded. Isn't it possible that the subsystem name occurs elsewhere and/or has been in some way added to a hashed

trying to determine cause of LASTACK State

2024-08-12 Thread Lizette Koehler
List I have a condition where if I do TSO NETSTAT (PORT 23 - Yep Mainframe I am seeing lots of IP Addresses in STATE LASTACK This cause me to do a lot of TCPIP DROP commands to clear it out I have had to build Several Automation functions to drop them hourly. I have had

IBM CSM (Copy Service Manger) - PPRC paths

2024-08-12 Thread BM
Global Mirror (GM) system - Global Mirror Failover/Failback w/Practice. Trying to increase the PPRC paths in GM, looking for inputs if anyone in this group have performed this through IBM CSM. I have validated additional new paths already and ready to configure. Here is the plan: Step 1: Pause

Re: Multiple VIPAs

2024-08-12 Thread roscoe5
Just an FYI - lesson learned if anyone cares. I had planned to dynamically add the new interface in both the PROFILE dataset and in OMPROUTE. It turns out the order is very important, and I Assumed wrong. I did the Obey on the Profile first, which caused OSPF to learn partial info. It dynamically

Re: trying to determine cause of LASTACK State

2024-08-12 Thread Mike Schwab
10,* is your Wide Area Network within your business router. Similar to 192,168.* within a smaller router https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_network On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 12:50 PM Lizette Koehler wrote: > > > > List > > > > I have a condition where if I do TSO NETSTAT (PORT 23 - Yep Mai

Re: trying to determine cause of LASTACK State

2024-08-12 Thread Attila Fogarasi
Client power off will do that ... are these virtual machine clients? Those are easy to power off thoughtlessly. The state isn't really a problem, the session is closed but client hasn't sent the last ACK. Everything is cleaned up in z/OS except whatever control block Netstat is using to show tha