Re: Resource manager for subsystem

Thru a program. Change the subsystem name in the SSCT (perhaps change one character to lower case) and free everything. Of course, be careful that nothing is running in the code dynamically loaded. On Sat, 10 Aug 2024 21:16:56 -0400 Joseph Reichman <05812645a43c-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>

Re: Resource manager for subsystem

I'm a bit rusty in this area. >From the subsystem vector table (SVCCT?) there is an anchor field for your subsystem use. I assume that you are using this to anchor all of the storage you allocate, and set flags on anything you change. While you are debugging your code, you could have something

Re: Identify the SCLM version

Thanks for the suggestions, I will take a look. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: Resource manager for subsystem

,I have found this thread interesting, and what I believe is needed is a SSI ROLLBACK or UNDO function. So that in the ESTAE/ESTAEX routine or in the init routine itself the "system" would remove any changes made SSCVT, SSVT, Remove the SSID etc. . This may not help the original poster with resp

Re: Resource manager for subsystem

Doesn’t that require an ipl > On Aug 11, 2024, at 7:35 AM, esst...@juno.com wrote: > > ,I have found this thread interesting, and what I believe is needed > is a SSI ROLLBACK or UNDO function. So that in the ESTAE/ESTAEX routine > or in the init routine itself the "system" would remove any chan

Re: Resource manager for subsystem

Esteem took the words out of my mouth what I’m looking for What is called RFE request for enhancement Maybe a parm on the SETSSI DELETE,PROG= > On Aug 11, 2024, at 9:29 AM, Joseph Reichman wrote: > > Doesn’t that require an ipl > >> On Aug 11, 2024, at 7:35 AM, esst...@juno.com wrote: >>

Re: Resource manager for subsystem

Whilst dynamically adding common storage objects such as subsystems and executables is commonplace, well used and understood, removing them is much trickier to do safely outside of a test/sandpit environment. Knowing with 100% certainty that no other UOW is about to reference the memory that yo

Re: Resource manager for subsystem

Removing an SSCT is not for the faint of heart. On Sun, 11 Aug 2024 11:33:21 GMT "esst...@juno.com" wrote: :>,I have found this thread interesting, and what I believe is needed :>is a SSI ROLLBACK or UNDO function. So that in the ESTAE/ESTAEX routine :>or in the init routine itself the "system

Re: CBU upgrade

Thank you So I can just go ahead activate another CBU license while.the system is up Any ibm documentation available to support this statement ? On Sun, 11 Aug 2024, 05:11 Michael Brennan, < 05d22523f8f7-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > No down time required. Should be completely tra

Re: Resource manager for subsystem

Almost every vendor package from rocket software to mxi uses CSA So I’m sure you take precautions Thanks > On Aug 11, 2024, at 11:09 AM, Binyamin Dissen > <0662573e2c3a-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > Removing an SSCT is not for the faint of heart. > > On Sun, 11 Aug 2024 11:

Re: CBU upgrade

There used to a CoD (capacity on demand) Redbook and also a CoD users guide on the IBM Resource link website. Both covered the CBU topic. Sent from Outlook for Android From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Peter <05e4a8a0a0

Re: CBU upgrade

Besides the Redbook PH mentioned, check with the SSR who will be applying the update. Maybe there's something in the MES install notes that says "nondisruptive" or similar. But don't wait until the last week to apply the MES. Very rarely, there are problems with an SE that don't show up unti

Re: Resource manager for subsystem

Absolutely. There are circumstances where releasing common storage is just not possible while at the same time preserving system integrity and the software has no option to "orphan" it. Obviously developers try and keep that amount to the smallest possible they can and sometimes use techniques

Re: Resource manager for subsystem

That should be "no option but to orphan it" Rob Get Outlook for Android From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Rob Scott <0618c90e6fdf-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2024 5:32:55 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LIST

Re: Fw: Multiple VIPAs

I thought I had an answer, but no. (Hard to test; can’t IPL) Trying to make this clearer. We currently have a single VIPA and two physical INTERFACE statements, let's say ... INTERFACE VIPALINK1 DEFINE VIRTUAL IPADDR 7.7.7.7 INTERFACE LINK0010 DEFINE IPAQENET PORTNAME T0010 IPADDR 10.1.1.1/