On Fri, 24 Nov 2023 09:07:54 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>On Fri, 24 Nov 2023 00:29:34 -0600, Jon Perryman wrote:
>>For temporary datasets, when is there ever a need for VOL=REF unless you are
>>working with a volume?
>>
>It's needed when allocating the same the same temp data set to two diffe
On Sat, 25 Nov 2023 10:38:23 -0600, Jon Perryman wrote:
>>>
>>It's needed when allocating the same the same temp data set to two different
>>ddnames within s single job step, regardless of volume.
>
>Are you saying that DD DDNAME= doesn't work without VOL=REF? Are you saying
>that DSN=&&TEMP
Hi everyone,
For fun (took me a total of 5 minutes), I created a GPT that ingested public
documentation and utilizes the information it had about the mainframe to answer
basic Q&A.
I took it for a test run with some basic questions such as "how do I create a
new linklist" or "how do I configu
Link:
https://chat.openai.com/g/g-7YAhxdmah-mainframe-maestro
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
I believe that several years ago IBM Pubs decreed that "data set"
rather than "dataset" was preferred style and swept documentation
emending the latter form. It seems to be creeping back. I just
did a crude scan of the 3.1 .pdfs a d found 96260 occurrences of
" data set " vs. 1422 of " dataset
Hi everyone,
For fun (took me a total of 5 minutes), I created a GPT that ingested public
documentation and utilizes the information it had about the mainframe to answer
basic Q&A.
I took it for a test run with some basic questions such as "how do I create a
new linklist" or "how do I configu
IBM seems to have a compulsion to periodically change nomenclature, e.g., going
from data management to data administration.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Hello
I am able to see the below alert condition under RMF postprocessor III
Name Reason Critical val. Possible cause or action
*STOR TSQAO > 0 1409K bytes SQA overflow into CSA 1409K.
Our SQA and CSA set up in our IEASYSxx is as below
CSA=(2000,30)
SQA=(16,192)
Hardware: z14
