On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 22:35:12 -0500, Joseph Reichman
wrote:
>I got the following message tracing VERBX routine under TEST
>BLS18100I ASID(X'0040') 01EF_8550 not available
>
>Yet when I do the following running IPCS from the TSO command prompt
> LIST 01EF_8550. ASID(X'0040') LENGTH(X'64')
Although setting up your own SAF class is not difficult, it is another step in
the installation/migration process and my instinct (bearing in mind the
squeeze on staffing resources) is always to tend to "zero-config" wherever
possible.
If you stay within your lanes as far as the profile namesp
Regardless of whether it is hard or easy, why would you
want to bother creating a new class when there is an
existing class (XFACILIT) that completely addresses the problem
(and thus would be easier for a customer)?
Peter Relson
z/OS Core Technology Design
---
This is why I have some sympathy for the military guys who have to decide what
knowledge to classify. We're told all the horror stories about stupidly-held
secrets that don't need to be secrets, and it isn’t that I don't believe them.
And the boundaries of one military airfield may not be that
While some have suggested creating your own class, there is an off-the-shelf
class suitable for XDC's use: XFACILIT.
- Maximum resource length is 246
- Default return code is 8 (everything is denied if the resource is not defined)
This is just as suitable as creating your own class name, and pos
XDAP is basically EXCP with some housekeeping for DASD.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Attila Fogarasi
Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2023 5:30 PM
To: IBM-MAI
On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 01:10:14 -0600, Jon Perryman wrote:
>
>>Suppose I am writing with QSAM/BSAM to a UNIX file allocated
>>RECFM=FB,LRECL=80,FILEDATA=BINARY,PATH=...
>>Should I specify:
>>o BLKSIZE=80 for minimum latency for other jobs doing "tail -f"?
>
>z/OS Unix filesystems are linear datasets.
Joe wrote:
> I got a number of responses but I decided to use the post By Adam Johanson
> using storage map services below is my code
It appears that I am now pot-committed to this thread, so here goes.
John P. wrote:
> My suggestion would be to start from a function use of ADPLSACC which ca
John P. wrote:
> VERBX VSMDATA should show allocated 64 storage.
You have to use the RSMDATA subcommand to see the above-the-bar allocations. As
a starting point, see RSMDATA HIGHVIRTUAL .
===
Adam Johanson
Broadcom Mainframe Software Division
--
I’m using test to debug this thanks
> On Nov 13, 2023, at 11:28 AM, Adam Johanson
> <031ca9d720a7-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> Joe wrote:
>> I got a number of responses but I decided to use the post By Adam Johanson
>> using storage map services below is my code
>
> It appe
Gadi, Binyamin, Rob, Ed, Phil, Hayim and Peter!
Thank you all for good information and a GREAT discussion!
Like some of you, I also am very sensitive to the customer's burden,
so while creating a "$XDC" class perhaps might be "easy", to
paraphrase Peter, why would I make a customer do that whe
On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 09:11:19 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>>On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 01:10:14 -0600, Jon Perryman wrote:
>>z/OS Unix filesystems are linear datasets.
>No. BLKSIZE is not ignored.
Incorrect, BLKSIZE has no meaning for VSAM linear datasets. By definition, "All
linear data set byte
On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 12:58:16 + Peter Relson wrote:
:>Regardless of whether it is hard or easy, why would you
:>want to bother creating a new class when there is an
:>existing class (XFACILIT) that completely addresses the problem
:>(and thus would be easier for a customer)?
DEFAULTRC
OPERATI
Changing the length to =AD(100) did it thanks
Adam
> On Nov 13, 2023, at 1:04 PM, Joseph Reichman wrote:
>
> I’m using test to debug this thanks
>
>>> On Nov 13, 2023, at 11:28 AM, Adam Johanson
>>> <031ca9d720a7-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>> Joe wrote:
>>> I got a n
On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 12:54:31 -0600, Jon Perryman wrote:
>...
>> and probably has some effect on performance for QSAM.
>
>I'm guessing that performance benefit is insignificant. More important is the
>adverse effect of buffering by BSAM / QSAM. It violates the UNIX standard of
>concurrent writ
On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 13:30:56 -0500, David Cole wrote:
>so while creating a "$XDC" class perhaps might be "easy", to
>paraphrase Peter, why would I make a customer do that when I don't have to...
>
>So thank you to those who tipped me off about the XFACILIT. It sounds
>perfect for my needs.
Dave,
Hi Jon,
Thanks for your thoughts, but I'm not trying to
decide if I should use FACILITY. I'm trying to
decide how I should go about discontinuing using FACILITY.
Based on suggestions from others on this thread,
I've made the decision to switch to using a class named XFACILIT.
[Switching wi
While BLKSIZE has no meaning for linear data sets, it *does* have meaning for
the BSAM compatibiliy interface.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Jon
Perryman
On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 at 13:54, Jon Perryman wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 09:11:19 -0600, Paul Gilmartin
> wrote:
>
> >>On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 01:10:14 -0600, Jon Perryman
> wrote:
> >>z/OS Unix filesystems are linear datasets.
>
Some are.
>No. BLKSIZE is not ignored.
>
> Incorrect, BLKSIZE has n
On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 19:09:26 -0500, Tony Harminc wrote:
>>
>> >>On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 01:10:14 -0600, Jon Perryman >> wrote:
>> >>z/OS Unix filesystems are linear datasets.
>
>Some are.
>
Exceptions might be sockets, descriptors, pipes, and NFS. And not all
UNIX files belong to filesystems.
>>No.
How to handle this situation: task ‘A’ attaches a subtask, task ‘B’.
The ‘B’ task issues a STIMERM WAIT=YES
Task ‘A’ terminates, but gets the A03 abend since task ‘B’ still active.
How can task ‘A’ communicate to the subtask ‘B’ that it (task ‘B’) needs to
terminate? Task ‘B’ is in the STIMER
DETACH? Or do you need something less disruptive?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Paul Schuster
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2023 7:37 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSER
Just off the top of my head from having a similar issue a few
years ago, you may need to be watching two ECBs (EVENTS). But I'm
not sure that the STIMERM won't cause a squawk when you have the
task end.
And I think you will have to pass the address of the ECB you will
POST for termination to
On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 at 19:37, Paul Schuster wrote:
> How to handle this situation: task ‘A’ attaches a subtask, task ‘B’.
>
> The ‘B’ task issues a STIMERM WAIT=YES
>
> Task ‘A’ terminates, but gets the A03 abend since task ‘B’ still active.
>
> How can task ‘A’ communicate to the subtask ‘B’ tha
24 matches
Mail list logo
