Re: Do you need a coupling facility to implement DVIPA?

2023-04-24 Thread Allan Staller
Classification: Confidential I have set up something similar. I called it a "toggle-plex". (2 LPAR base sysplex in one box). This was set up as a base sysplex with CTC's for GRS (and VTAM/TCPIP) communication. (yes I did use a DVPIP). PARMLIBs/PROCLIBs/Catalogs were shared. (note there is some

Re: IOF End of Support Direction.....

2023-04-24 Thread Rob Scott
I am not familiar with IOF functionality, however I do know that many years ago SDSF added the ability to issue action commands using the "row number" of the panel object. To enable this facility issue "SET ROWNUM ON" to see the row numbers on each panel to the right of the "NP" column, and th

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: IOF End of Support Direction.....

2023-04-24 Thread Pommier, Rex
We're using Automon from Macro4 and it has that capability as well. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of kekronbekron Sent: Friday, April 21, 2023 10:34 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: IOF End of Support Direction. Phoenix Sof

TSO Rexx C2X Incorrect Output

2023-04-24 Thread David Spiegel
Hi, I am writing a TSO Rexx Exec to Parse fields from a DCOLLECT output (VB/32756/32760). One statement is: created=C2x(Substr(dcollect.i,105,4)) (In DCOLLECT parlance, this is DCDCREDT). For any date greater than 2000-01-01, I get the expected result. But, when the field contains x'1999160F' (I

XLC architecture level question

2023-04-24 Thread Phil Smith III
SC14-7307-40, the z/OS 2.4 XL C/C++ User's Guide, says on PDF page 63 that ARCH(10) is the default. However, on PDF page 580, it also says: Architecture target is set according to the last-found instance of the -qarch compiler option, provided that the specified -qarch setting is compatible with th

IBM RCF Documentation email address?

2023-04-24 Thread Farley, Peter
Is there a different documentation error / omission address then this one for IBM manuals? mhvr...@us.ibm.com I sent one to that address on April 4 and have yet to receive any reply, not even an acknowledgement that the email was received. Peter This message and any

Re: IBM RCF Documentation email address?

2023-04-24 Thread Colin Paice
mhvr...@us.ibm.com is the right address for z/OS products.They are not very good at replying or acknowledging. Colin On Mon, 24 Apr 2023 at 16:31, Farley, Peter < 031df298a9da-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > Is there a different documentation error / omission address then this one

Re: TSO Rexx C2X Incorrect Output

2023-04-24 Thread kekronbekron
There's a thing called DCOLREXX here - https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.4.0?topic=tools-arctools-job-sample-tool-members Don't know if it'll meet your exact needs, but REXX parsers for DCOL data are already out there. - KB --- Original Message --- On Monday, April 24th, 2023 at 8:40 PM

Re: TSO Rexx C2X Incorrect Output

2023-04-24 Thread Farley, Peter
Something else must be off in that code, maybe the offset in the substr? I used Gilbert Saint-Flour's REXXTRY and got this result: READY REXXTRY SAY C2X('1996160F'X) END 1996160F Peter -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discu

cyberark efforts

2023-04-24 Thread Bill Giannelli
our company is pushing forward with cyberark for all platforms. the statement was made that cyberark and the like are becoming the industry standard. Is that true for z/OS systems? thanks Bill -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff

Re: TSO Rexx C2X Incorrect Output

2023-04-24 Thread Sri h Kolusu
>> One statement is: created=C2x(Substr(dcollect.i,105,4)) (In DCOLLECT parlance, this is DCDCREDT). David, One thing you may want to check is that you are doing the conversion ONLY for Type "D" Records, because position 105 has other data for TYPE V or TYPE DC Thanks, Kolusu ---

Re: XLC architecture level question

2023-04-24 Thread Linda Chui
On Mon, 24 Apr 2023 11:24:25 -0400, Phil Smith III wrote: >SC14-7307-40, the z/OS 2.4 XL C/C++ User's Guide, says on PDF page 63 that >ARCH(10) is the default. However, on PDF page 580, it also says: >Architecture target is set according to the last-found instance of the >-qarch compiler option,

Re: cyberark efforts

2023-04-24 Thread Mark Jacobs
We use CyberArk for all privileged accounts, including z/OS. Mark Jacobs Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email. GPG Public Key - https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get&search=markjac...@protonmail.com --- Original Message --- On Monday, April 24th, 2023 at 12:15 PM,

Re: TSO Rexx C2X Incorrect Output

2023-04-24 Thread David Spiegel
Hi Kolusu, I made sure of that only "D" Records are being processed. Thanks and regards, David On 2023-04-24 12:15, Sri h Kolusu wrote: One statement is: created=C2x(Substr(dcollect.i,105,4)) (In DCOLLECT parlance, this is DCDCREDT). David, One thing you may want to check is that you are doi

Re: cyberark efforts

2023-04-24 Thread Bill Giannelli
do you share groups of accounts? Or do you have a one to one ids? cyberark id to racf id? On Mon, 24 Apr 2023 16:23:15 +, Mark Jacobs wrote: >We use CyberArk for all privileged accounts, including z/OS. > >Mark Jacobs > >Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email. > >GPG Public Key

Re: cyberark efforts

2023-04-24 Thread Mark Jacobs
We have multiple RACF databases, the passwords are all kept in sync via RRSF links. One userid/one password. Mark Jacobs Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email. GPG Public Key - https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get&search=markjac...@protonmail.com --- Original Message

Re: cyberark efforts

2023-04-24 Thread Bill Giannelli
kept in sync with cyberark? On Mon, 24 Apr 2023 16:55:24 +, Mark Jacobs wrote: >We have multiple RACF databases, the passwords are all kept in sync via RRSF >links. One userid/one password. > >Mark Jacobs > >Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email. > >GPG Public Key - >https://a

Re: cyberark efforts

2023-04-24 Thread Mark Jacobs
Yes. Once a day, or when my checked out password expires I sign on to Cyberark and checkout the new password. I then can use that to logon to any system regardless of the RACF database it uses. Mark Jacobs Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email. GPG Public Key - https://api.proto

Re: cyberark efforts

2023-04-24 Thread Patrick Loftus
Hi, I gather there is no supplied connector specific to z/OS. Does your site use SSH to connect to z/OS and reset passwords, or do you have an in-house written connector? Thanks -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Jacobs Sent: Monday, April 24, 2

Re: cyberark efforts

2023-04-24 Thread Mark Jacobs
Sorry. I have no idea how the whole thing works from an infrastructure POV. I'm just a user, these were my observations at my $currentjob. Mark Jacobs Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email. GPG Public Key - https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get&search=markjac...@protonmail.c

Re: XLC architecture level question

2023-04-24 Thread Phil Smith III
Linda Chui wrote: >My colleague validated this issue. Yes, this is a documentation error. >The default should be the same as the ARCH option description >mentioned (page 63). We have notified our content editor to >update/correct our docs. >Thanks for bringing this to our attention. Tha

Re: XLC architecture level question

2023-04-24 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Mon, 24 Apr 2023 17:40:16 -0400, Phil Smith III wrote: > >Thank you! Does that default change periodically? I suppose it must-is it >always such that the default supports the oldest currently supported >hardware? What we don't want to do is upgrade the compile and break our >product for our cust

Re: cyberark efforts

2023-04-24 Thread Bill Johnson
We used Cyberark at a former employer. Starting around 2014 or 15. Our security department, none of whom had mainframe experience, chose it to solve a problem we didn’t have. I’m pretty sure the head of security read about it on a flight. Or an auditor did. It slows down everything on the MF. In

Re: XLC architecture level question

2023-04-24 Thread Phil Smith III
Gil wrote: >A default of "oldest currently supported" is of little use on the day >before end of support for that version. Better would be a form to >specify "whatever version for which support is guaranteed for N days >from the current date." Akin to the "find ... -mtime n". Eh? Why is it "of lit