I thnk a VTAM cmd code of 23 is an application requested cancel.
Joe
On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 10:46 PM Jake Anderson
wrote:
> Hello
>
> One of our application was reporting the below error. I was looking through
> the SNA and IP codes but not able to find or am ignorant about the below
> code
>
Hello Joe
Would you please point me to the manual where it explains?
On Sun, Feb 12, 2023, 1:20 PM Joe Monk wrote:
> I thnk a VTAM cmd code of 23 is an application requested cancel.
>
> Joe
>
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 10:46 PM Jake Anderson
> wrote:
>
> > Hello
> >
> > One of our application w
Jake,
What application is this from?
Joe
On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 3:24 AM Jake Anderson
wrote:
> Hello Joe
>
> Would you please point me to the manual where it explains?
>
> On Sun, Feb 12, 2023, 1:20 PM Joe Monk wrote:
>
> > I thnk a VTAM cmd code of 23 is an application requested cancel.
> >
I think the SMFID is older than SYSNAME. I think SYSNAME dates from the late
80s or 90s, whereas SMFID was in the early versions of MVS.
Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Rob
Schramm
Sent: 11 February 2023 20:01
To: IBM-MAIN@LIS
Page 4-82 of the PoOPS says:
"If CPU power-on reset establishes the configuration, then it sets the
architectural mode to one of the following:
-
The ESA/390 mode (when neither the ESA/390-compatibility-mode facility
nor the CZAM facility is installed)
-
The ESA/390-compatibility
I just wanted to fold text fields to uppercase
Example:
SORT FIELDS=(1,20,CH,A)
OUTREC BUILD=(1,80,TRAN=LTOU)
It works as it should, with the exception for national characters.
Examples:
johh bravo -> JOHN BRAVO
łukasz świątek -? łUKASZ śWIąTEK
I used LOCALE=PL_pl in DFSPARM DD, but it is accep
While SYSNAME is often not the same as SMFID (such as when customers find a
productive use of the extra 4 characters available for system name), many
create their SMFID using some part of the sysname, such as by using a substring
expression of &SYSNAME. That would fall under "is related to".
Pe
Try checking for VTAM return code x10 fdbk2 x09
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
On Feb 12, 2023, at 06:21:36, Radoslaw Skorupka wrote:
>
> I just wanted to fold text fields to uppercase
> Example:
> SORT FIELDS=(1,20,CH,A)
> OUTREC BUILD=(1,80,TRAN=LTOU)
>
> It works as it should, with the exception for national characters.
> Examples:
> johh bravo -> JOHN BRAVO
> łukasz św
>> I just wanted to fold text fields to uppercase. It works as it should, with
>> the exception for national characters.
Radoslaw,
TRAN=LTOU Translates lowercase EBCDIC letters(that is, a-z) to uppercase
EBCDIC letters (that is, A - Z). Other characters are not changed. Here is
the document
>> I assume UNICODE Services did this. Doesn't DFSORT use UNICODE Services?
Paul,
DFSORT does indeed use UNICODE services, but it ONLY limited for SORTING
Unicode data and NOT for data manipulation (case conversion/ CCSID
conversion..) . So far, the request for data manipulation for Unicode d
>> VTAM error RtnCd:100900 Sense: Cmd:23 Where exactly I can find the
>> explanation for 100900 ?
Jake,
As John has mentioned Your return code is X'10' and feedback '09'
16(X'10') 9 Unconditional Terminate or character-coded logoff
received
The logical unit has sent an uncondi
Important: The TIMEUSED macro is NOT throwing an error. In the assembler
routine, I changed the BNZ AGAIN to branch to an Abend: BNZ ABEND_0001
It never branched to the abend label.
This routine returns different results when invoked Static versus Dynamic from
IBM COBOL 6.
The
IMHO, the fault lies in the character stream orientation of UNIX, C, HTML
etc. The shorted-sighted design was motivated by the limited budgets and
underpowered systems of many early UNIX users.
On record oriented systems, (z/OS and z/VM) common operations are faster,
because the needed informatio
I have not been able to find a DSECT or a description of the RRB blocks used
by the RRSAF attachment. The DSN and CAF blocks are described.
Can someone point me to it?
My main issue is determining in a simple way if the code is running in a WLM
Stored Procedure address space. I figure that there
On 2023-02-12 12:02 PM, Chris P Fried wrote:
I have run out of ideas on what could cause the results to be different when
the routine is invoked via a Static call.
"The Goog" led me to this:
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/cobol-zos/6.1?topic=program-performance-considerations-static-dynamic-calls
Four level cache in 1994?
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Hobart Spitz
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2023 1:34 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Irish data centersan opportunity?
IMHO, the fault lies in the character stream
Yes, I agree that a STATIC call has less overhead to be loaded and even
invoked.
However, that does not explain why the TIMEUSED macro returns wrong Values.
Basically:
CALL WS-CPUTIME USING WS-START-VALUE might give a value of 1000
microseconds. <-- Dynamic COBOL Call
Do some CPU
On Sun, 12 Feb 2023 12:34:18 -0600, Hobart Spitz wrote:
>IMHO, the fault lies in the character stream orientation of UNIX, C, HTML
>etc. The shorted-sighted design was motivated by the limited budgets and
>underpowered systems of many early UNIX users.
>
"Underpowered" systems led to power-hungr
The cost to the fixed length fields and records is padding with
blanks. That results in streaming files having a 2/1 compression
ratio and fixed length files having a 4/1 ratio.
On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 12:34 PM Hobart Spitz wrote:
>
> IMHO, the fault lies in the character stream orientation of U
Is AT-TLS (or some other encryption mechanism) supported in the case of z/OS
running as an NFS >client<, connecting to (for example) a Linux NFS server?
I've been looking through the doc and haven't yet found a definitive answer.
Looking for a solution to enable z/OS to act as an NFS client and
I think that they are not different for that very reason in most shops. Fear of
making a mistake on the HMC or elsewhere.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Scott Chapman
Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2023 7:46 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
On Sun, 12 Feb 2023 at 07:24, Joe Monk wrote:
> Page 4-82 of the PoOPS says:
>
> "If CPU power-on reset establishes the configuration, then it sets the
> architectural mode to one of the following:
>
>-
>
>The ESA/390 mode (when neither the ESA/390-compatibility-mode facility
>nor the
Hi Rob,
My guess is yes, but that's no definitive answer. SHARE session 16948 -
Leveraging z/OS Comm Server At-TLS, contains the email address of what may be
one of the developers. If no one here provides a definitive answer you might
want to reach out to Lin. I did so several years ago and g
On 2/12/2023 12:52 PM, Robert Garrett wrote:
Is AT-TLS (or some other encryption mechanism) supported in the case of z/OS running
as an NFS >client<, connecting to (for example) a Linux NFS server?
For many years, NFS was a UDP-only protocol and therefore incompatible
with AT-TLS which suppor
25 matches
Mail list logo
