On 19/08/2022 12:10 am, Charles Mills wrote:
There is always a line of tourists -- many of them American -- at the McDonalds
on the Champs-Élysées.
There's also a Starbucks on the Champs-Élysées! Considering the French
pride themselves on their cafe culture that's quite a surprise.
I am t
Once more into the breach.
All of this has been covered multiple times, but searching archives is no one's
favorite thing to do and often it's too hard to find what you want.
Use of LNKLST ALLOCATE/UNALLOCATE is solely provided so that you can access
uncataloged datasets of the same name as a L
The application "got abended" because something running under that task
mis-issued DETACH.
The doc for completion code 23E reason 0 seems pretty clear.
The entry requirement for DETACH is:
R1 contains the address of a word which contains the address of the TCB of the
task to be detached.
If you
>I am just trying to get all the memory object of the asid I am running in.
It sounds like you should not have specified V64SHARED=YES and V64COMMON=YES.
I think what you got might have been:
* Everything that matched V64SHARED=YES, plus
* Everything that matched V64COMMON=YES, plus
*
Classification: Confidential
Looks like you a) forgot the LLA refresh and b) did not add the "new library"
to lnklstxx
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2022 1:32 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Linklist
Classification: Confidential
The original lnklst dataset remains in use for the length of the IPL unless
modified via the SETPROG process.
There is a well documented procedure for doing what the OP is trying to
accomplish.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behal
Classification: Confidential
The new lnklst must be explicitly defined and activated. It doesn't
automagically happen.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2022 2:57 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [EXTE
that's what I suggested at first,
I think the original linklist is still active, shutting down LLA and
VLF, only used to fetch members faster. I think you need to create a new
LINKLST
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.4.0?topic=command-updating-lnklst-concatenations
and make it active
I real
On Tue, 23 Aug 2022 12:12:47 +, Allan Staller wrote:
>Classification: Confidential
>...
>::DISCLAIMER::
>
>The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and
>intended for the named recipient(s) only. E-mail transmission is not
>guarant
Peter
I think that in order to get the memory objects in the address space I am
running in
I have to compare the asid specified by V64WACallerAsid to the asid I’m looking
for
The ownerasid parameter refers to common memory objects
Thanks
> On Aug 23, 2022, at 8:10 AM, Peter Relson wrote:
Hi all,
I have been reading the manual and I think that the answer to my question
will be negative but may be I am missing something: is there a way to use
the IPL date on a date comparison on the INCLUDE/OMIT fields?
Thank you all for your help,
Regards,
Jack
---
>> there a way to use the IPL date on a date comparison on the INCLUDE/OMIT
>> fields?
Jack,
How do you plan to get the IPL date? Are you going to use /D IPLINFO ? We can
generate dynamic symbol for the date parsing that information which can use in
your INCLUDE/OMIT
Thanks,
Kolusu
-
Hi Kolusu,
I was hoping that DFSORT might have a way to use it directly as I want the
JCL to be simple to read and maintain. But if I can use a STEP with a /D
IPLINFO to get it, it would solve my problem.
Regards
Jack
On Tue, 23 Aug 2022 at 16:56, Sri h Kolusu wrote:
> >> there a way to use th
Hi all,
I need to execute a job every Thursday that takes place before the second
Saturday of each month which, unfortunately, is not the second Thursday of
each month. Is there a way to do this using IWS? From what I have gathered
so far, I can only use relative days for a future date, not for a
Easy
You define a run which is scheduled the Saturday and and the run def you define
an offset of -4 days
Cordialement
Philippe TESSIER
Systèmes et Documents
162 rue Maurice arnoux
92120 montrouge
www.setd.fr
: +33 1 56 53 70 12
: +33 6 14 13 31 51
: mailto:ptess...@setd.fr
: ptessiersetd
>
Thank you Philippe.
Regards,
Jack
On Tue, 23 Aug 2022 at 17:18, Philippe Tessier wrote:
> Easy
>
> You define a run which is scheduled the Saturday and and the run def you
> define an offset of -4 days
>
> Cordialement
>
> Philippe TESSIER
> Systèmes et Documents
> 162 rue Maurice arnoux
> 92120
You define second Saturday with rule
Cordialement
Philippe TESSIER
Systèmes et Documents
162 rue Maurice arnoux
92120 montrouge
www.setd.fr
: +33 1 56 53 70 12
: +33 6 14 13 31 51
: mailto:ptess...@setd.fr
: ptessiersetd
> Le 23 août 2022 à 18:20, Jack Zukt a écrit :
>
> Thank you Philippe
On Tue, 23 Aug 2022 18:21:25 +0200, Philippe Tessier wrote:
>You define second Saturday with rule
>
Rule? Specify.
>>> On Tue, 23 Aug 2022 at 17:18, Philippe Tessier wrote:
>>>
>>> You define a run which is scheduled the Saturday and and the run def you
>>> define an offset of -4 days
>>>
-
Hi Paul,
Using the first Saturday plus five days will probably be the best approach.
Unfortunately, I was so worried trying to figure out how to schedule two
days backwards that I missed the obvious choice. For me, this is one of the
main advantages of this group, pointing me to the right directio
Well, the second day of the week occurs on 8th to 14th.
2 days earlier is 6th to 12th.
So Thursday and 6-12 of month.
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 11:21 AM Philippe Tessier wrote:
>
> You define second Saturday with rule
>
> Cordialement
>
> Philippe TESSIER
> Systèmes et Documents
> 162 rue Maurice a
I got to talking with a church friend about encryption, and at lunch yesterday
he lent me a book on number theory that has a chapter on asymmetric encryption.
Cryptography has long been a hobby of mine, but it's only recently that I came
to understand a little of how asymmetric encryption can w
Hi,
(m,n) is the great common divisor between m and n.
Can't tell what phi(26)=12 is, but I would say is something like "there are 12
coprimes among the 26 first natural numbers".
Horacio
De: IBM Mainframe Discussion List en nombre de Bob
Bridges
Enviado: mart
Ah, so "(a, 26) = 1" simply states what I had already figured out, that
there must be no common factors between them. (Not counting 1 itself, of
course.) I think I read once that another way of saying that is " and
26 are mutually prime". Thanks, Horacio.
I'm thinking that in one sense there ar
Comment from another knowledgeable cove:
"In number theory, Euler's totient function counts the positive integers up to
a given integer n that are relatively prime to n. It is written using the Greek
letter phi as φ(n) or ϕ(n), and may also be called Euler's phi function. In
other words, it is
On Tue, 23 Aug 2022 17:12:17 -0400, Bob Bridges wrote:
>Ah, so "(a, 26) = 1" simply states what I had already figured out, that
>there must be no common factors between them. (Not counting 1 itself, of
>course.) ...
>
That might go without saying because 1 is not a prime.
--
gil
-
25 matches
Mail list logo
